The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

China grants initial approval to 38 new Trump trademarks

- By Simon Denyer Washington Post

SHANGHAI — China has granted preliminar­y approval for 38 new Trump trademarks, a move that offers a potential business foothold for President Donald Trump’s family company and protects his name in a country notorious for counterfei­ters.

The trademarks cover everything from hotels and golf clubs to bodyguard and concierge services, public documents show.

Trump’s lawyers in China applied for the marks in April 2016, as Trump railed against China at campaign rallies, accusing it of currency manipulati­on and stealing U.S. jobs. Critics maintain that Trump’s swelling portfolio of China trademarks raises the possibilit­y of conflicts of interest.

China’s Trademark Office published the provisiona­l approvals on Feb. 27 and Monday.

If no one objects, they will be formally registered after 90 days. All but three are in the president’s own name. China already registered one trademark to the president, for Trump-branded constructi­on services on Feb. 14, the result of a 10-year legal battle that turned in Trump’s favor after he declared his candidacy.

Ethics lawyers across the political spectrum say that if Trump receives any special treatment in securing trademark rights, it would violate the U.S. Constituti­on, which bans public servants from accepting anything of value from foreign government­s unless approved by Congress. Concerns about potential conflicts of interest are particular­ly sharp in China, where the courts and bureaucrac­y are designed to reflect the will of the ruling Communist Party.

Trump Organizati­on chief legal officer Alan Garten said the company has been enforcing its intellectu­al property rights for more than a decade in China and began registerin­g trademarks relating to its core real estate brand years before Trump announced his presidenti­al run.

“The latest registrati­ons are a natural result of those longstandi­ng, diligent efforts and any suggestion to the contrary demonstrat­es a complete disregard of the facts as well as a lack of understand­ing of internatio­nal trademark law,” he said in an email.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States