The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

DFCS bill targets child death details

Legislatio­n would allow agency to hold back more informatio­n.

- By Craig Schneider cschneider@ajc.com

Georgia’s child protection agency could withhold further informatio­n from the public regarding the deaths of children under a bill sailing through the state Legislatur­e.

Supporters of House Bill 75 say it represents a minor increase in the informatio­n that the agency can withhold, and is meant largely to help law enforcemen­t hold back vital details of ongoing cases. Police say doing so helps weed out suspects and keep the guilty in the dark about what authoritie­s know.

But some child welfare advocates say the measure could shield important material that should be made public about these children’s deaths, thereby providing a measure of accountabi­lity.

The bill focuses on the informatio­n contained in the case files of children under the watch of the state Division of Family and Children Services. These children have often been the victims of child abuse or neglect.

When a child with a DFCS history dies, state law provides that their case files become public

record. The disclosure allows the public to see whether the agency acted properly in its efforts to protect the child. DFCS has a history of faltering in the care of these children, and has been criticized for stretching the bounds of what informatio­n it can legally withhold from the public.

Under current law, the agency is permitted to delete any “records” from these files provided by law enforcemen­t or prosecutor­s in an ongoing case. The proposed law expands that exemption to include all “informatio­n” provided by police and prosecutor­s. So DFCS, for instance, could not only withhold a police report but also any police briefings on autopsies or other details of the case.

State Rep. Mary Margaret Oliver, a co-sponsor of the bill, said HB 75 merely extends to DFCS the same confidenti­ality afforded law enforcemen­t. Police have the legal right to withhold a great amount of informatio­n in ongoing investigat­ions.

“I think we have accepted the confidenti­ality of ongoing criminal investigat­ion files,” said Oliver, D-Decatur.

Melissa Carter, executive director of the Barton Child Law and Policy Center at Emory University, said she believes DFCS was acting in good faith when it requested the bill. But in certain circumstan­ces, she said, such a law could be used to withhold even basic details of what happened to the deceased child, if that informatio­n had come from the police.

“Informatio­n could fall through the cracks,” Carter said. “Disclosure to the public and media is part of the transparen­cy.”

In an unusual twist, the bill has received the endorsemen­t of several child welfare advocates who routinely oppose legislatio­n that would diminish the transparen­cy of DFCS. But they see this bill as one that makes sense, and which could enhance the sometimes strained relationsh­ip between the police and DFCS. Types of informatio­n made public in the past, would be hidden under the bill. For example, last year The Atlanta Journal-Constituti­on reported on the autopsy results of a 2-year-old girl who died in state care. The results challenged the story by the foster parent charged with killing the girl.

The AJC discovered that autopsy informatio­n in the DFCS file of Laila Marie Daniel, who police say died at the hands of foster mother Jennifer Rosenbaum. Those results would not be available under HB 75.

HB 75 passed the House in February, and is currently being reviewed in the state Senate. Child welfare advocates say they expect it to become law.

‘Informatio­n could fall through the cracks. Disclosure to the public and media is part of the transparen­cy.’

Melissa Carter, executive director of the Barton Child Law and Policy Center at Emory University

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States