State of North Carolina’s loss hits home as tourney tips off

Law limiting LGBT protections spurs NCAA punishment.

GREENVILLE, S.C. — Times have changed in the Carolinas. Everyone knew this day was coming, but now it’s a reality.

The NCAA Tournament, a spring fixture in basketball-crazed North Carolina, is tipping off in South Carolina today. Because of statelevel politics, the NCAA no longer considers North Carolina a suitable host, while a political move has put South Carolina back in the governing body’s good graces.

North Carolina was stripped of opening-weekend games set for Greensboro due to a state law limiting protections for LGBT people. Instead, tradition-rich state powers Duke and UNC start play today in Greenville, S.C. South Carolina would not have been an option two years ago due to the presence of a Confederate flag on the state’s capitol grounds. But lawmakers took the flag down in 2015.

“I would hope that North Carolina should have learned from our lesson,” said South Carolina state Sen. Darrell Jackson, a Democrat and pastor of one of the state’s largest black churches. “That is, the longer you prolong this, it doesn’t change, it’s just going to be harder. I think it’s worse because they had it.”

The NCAA pulled seven championship events from North Carolina last fall after enactment of the law — known as HB2 — requiring transgender people to use restrooms at schools and government buildings corresponding to the sex listed on their birth certificates. It also excludes gender identity and sexual orientation from local and statewide antidiscrimination protections.

The NCAA only pulled events from predetermined sites. These events are awarded to sites regardless of which teams compete, and the NCAA’s decision doesn’t impact teams that earn homecourt advantage. That is why Duke’s women’s team is hosting an NCAA tourney game in Durham this week.

UNC coach Roy Williams is disappointed with the situation.

“Sad is ... the word I would use,” said Williams, coach of the South Region’s No. 1 seed. “The people in the state of North Carolina and the kids in the state of North Carolina aren’t getting the opportunities that we have had in the past.”

Along with the NCAA, the NBA pulled its all-star game from Charlotte, which also lost the Atlantic Coast Conference’s football championship game. Entertainers such as Bruce Springsteen and Pearl Jam have canceled performances in the state.

Duke coach Mike Krzyzewski called the law “a stupid thing.”

“South Carolina is known for great basketball and this is a great town, so we feel really good about being here,” said Krzyzewski, coach of the East’s No. 2 seed. “It would be nice if our state got as smart and also would host not just basketball tournaments but concerts and other NCAA events. But maybe we’ll get there in the next century, I don’t know, we’ll see.”

Finding a resolution recently intensified due to concern the NCAA will pass on North Carolina through 2022 when it announces its next round of predetermined sites. But attempts toward repeal or compromise have failed amid partisan distrust.

The team benefiting the most on the court might be South Carolina. Senior guard Duane Notice said the Gamecocks are happy for the chance to play in their home state.

But lawmakers say this isn’t about home court advantage. “I hope people don’t want to repeal House Bill 2 just because they want to have their basketball team” playing in the state, said North Carolina House Minority Leader Darren Jackson, a Democrat. “I hope they recognize that this is terrible for our state . ... There’s no single thing we can do that would improve our economy more, in my opinion, than repealing House Bill 2.”

The North Carolina Sports Association estimates more than $250 million in potential economic impact from 130 event bids submitted to the NCAA.

Still, many supporters stand firm despite the losses of marquee events.

Republican Rep. Mark Brody filed a bill this week seeking to file complaints with the IRS challenging the tax-exempt status of the NCAA and ACC, accusing them of using “economic retaliation.”