The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Google allows advertiser­s more control

Clients will be able to refuse placement of ads next to hate speech, other offensive material online.

- Mark Scott

Google moved Tuesday to protect its lucrative advertisin­g business by giving marketers greater control over where their ads appear online, after major clients withdrew spots that were shown next to hate speech and other offensive material.

Google has become a global advertisin­g behemoth, pocketing billions of dollars every year from brands promoting their goods through the company’s search engine and on YouTube. But the changes, which will be introduced in the coming weeks, highlight the difficult balance between protecting Google’s advertisin­g business while also allowing free speech.

By giving brands greater say over where their ads appears, experts say, Google is acknowledg­ing that it has not done enough so far to police the material on its sites.

“Recently, we had a number of cases where brands’ ads appeared on content that was not aligned with their values. For this, we deeply apologize,” Philipp Schindler, Google’s chief business officer, said in a blog post Tuesday. “We know that this is unacceptab­le to the advertiser­s and agencies who put their trust in us.”

Google’s efforts to clean up its act show how dependent it remains on online advertisin­g, despite the large bets its parent company, Alphabet, has made on other technologi­es, like driverless cars and health care.

Last year, Alphabet made $19.5 billion in net profit, a 23 percent annual jump, almost all of which was generated from Google’s advertisin­g business.

Google’s public mea culpa follows the pulling of ads by Havas, a French advertisin­g multinatio­nal. Havas withdrew spots for several of its clients from the search giant’s digital services in Britain after failing to receive assurances that they would not be shown next to offensive material.

As part of the advertisin­g revamp, Google said that it would rigorously vet online content that could be considered hate speech or derogatory content. That would include giving brands greater say

over where their ads would be shown online and powers to remove them if companies were still not satisfied.

The company said that it would hire more staff members to police its advertisin­g standards, adding that it would also use artificial intelligen­ce and other technology to remove harmful content.

“We believe the combinatio­n of these new policies and controls will significan­tly strengthen our ability to help advertiser­s,” Schindler said.

Google refrained, however, from saying that it would actively remove material before it had been flagged by users, a move that some policymake­rs, notably in Europe, have called for.

In a recent study in Germany, the company was found to have removed 90 percent of posts flagged as potential hate speech after it had been reported. That figure was markedly higher than those of Facebook and Twitter.

Google’s stance has come under increased scrutiny in recent months with the rise of so-called fake news and with hate speech connected to elections in the United States and Europe, among others.

Some freedom of speech campaigner­s have urged Google to stand its ground, but policymake­rs around the world have called on the company to do more to combat the spread of offensive material on the internet.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States