The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Tyrannosau­rus rex had scales, study says

Paleontolo­gists say species didn’t have full coat of feathers.

- By Ben Guarino Washington Post

Tyrannosau­rus rex was an odd animal, a predator with teeth the size of bananas, a massive head and tiny arms. Given that many dinosaurs had feathers, could T. rex have been even weirder — a giant carnivore with a downy coat?

A new study in the journal Biology Letters crushes any tyrant chicken dreams: T. rex was covered in scales. The new research “shows without question that T. rex had scaly skin,” study author Phil Bell, a paleontolo­gist at Australia’s University of New England, said in an email.

When T. rex first appeared in pop culture, as in 1918 film “The Ghost of Slumber Mountain,” the dinosaur had wrinkled skin and stood upright, dragging its tail. Scientists began dismantlin­g this reptilian misconcept­ion in the late 1960s, and in 1993’s “Jurassic Park,” a fairly accurate, horizontal T. rex menaced the silver screen.

The dino image changed again in the past few decades, as evidence for feathered species accumulate­d. Two tyrannosau­roids, Dilong and Yutyrannus — relatives that predated T. rex by some 50 million years — were covered in feathers. As for T. rex, artists drew ferocious and fluffy concept art. One museum gave its animatroni­c T. rex plumage.

But this was putting the quill before the fossil.

“With all the hype about feathered theropods, it’s easy to forget that actually most dinosaurs had scaly, reptilian-like skin,” Bell said. (Theropod dinosaurs included tyrannosau­rs and many other two-legged dinosaurs as well as bird ancestors.)

Bell and his colleagues examined skin from T. rex and four relatives from fairly late in tyrannosau­r history: Albertosau­rus, Daspletosa­urus, Gorgosauru­s and Tarbosauru­s. Tyrannosau­r skin is rare, Bell said, in part because paleontolo­gists historical­ly favored smashing through skin to get to bones.

From these skin patches, representi­ng the tyrannosau­r abdomen, chest, pelvis, neck and tail, the researcher­s found nothing but scales. If feathers existed, they did so only along the animals’ back or spines.

“This doesn’t rule out feathers on even the biggest tyrannosau­rs,” said University of London paleontolo­gist David Hone, who was not involved in the research, “but does suggest they lacked a full coat of feathers.”

The scientists propose several hypotheses for why T. rex was not covered in feathers, unlike its earlier relatives.

“Probably the sexiest option is gigantism,” Bell said.

Feathered Dilong was the size of a large dog. T. rex was about the length of a city bus.

“Big animals have trouble shedding excess heat, so being covered in feathers is not a good idea unless you live somewhere cold,” Bell said, pointing out that elephants, for instance, are not as furry as mice.

But Yutyrannus, though not quite as big as T. rex, was no pooch.

“The problem here is that we have big tyrannosau­rs, some with feathers, some without that live in pretty similar climates,” Bell said. “So what’s the reason for this difference? We really don’t know.”

 ?? PETER LARSON / AUSTRALIA UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND ?? Scales from the neck of a Tyrannosau­rus show that the skin was reptilian-like and was not covered in feathers.
PETER LARSON / AUSTRALIA UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND Scales from the neck of a Tyrannosau­rus show that the skin was reptilian-like and was not covered in feathers.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States