The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
View on violence appears to contradict Trump’s past comments
“The president in no way, form or fashion has ever promoted or encouraged violence.” — Sarah Huckabee Sanders on June 29 in a White House press briefing
We’re not considering Trump’s tweet of a GIF showing him body-slamming a figure labeled CNN at a professional wrestling match, which Trump sent several days after Huckabee Sand- ers’ comment. However, the record shows several cases in wh i ch Tr u mp has said things that we believe an ordinary listener would understand as encouraging violence.
For just one example, in March 2016 at a rally in Kansas City, talking about someone who had rushed the stage, Trump said, “I don’t know if I would have done well, but I would have been out there fighting, folks. I don’t know if I’d have done well, b ut I would’ve been — boom, boom, boom. I’ll beat the crap out of you.”
Whether Trump’s words would qualify legally as incitement to violence is questionable. Lee Rowland, a senior staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union wrote concerning a lawsuit stemming from a Trump rally in Louisville, “Over time, the Supreme Court ... adopted a very speech-protective test to determine when incitement has taken place ... It’s a high bar for a reason, and Trump’s conduct at the rally didn’t meet it.”
Our ruling
We found several examples in which Trump offered public musings that showed a tolerance for, and sometimes even a favorable disposition toward, physical violence. Trump’s words may not meet a legal threshold for incitement to violence, but Huckabee Sanders’ portrayal distorts the record of Trump’s past statements. We rate her statement False.