The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Why Republican­s soured on America’s colleges

- Kyle Wingfield He writes for The Atlanta Journal-Constituti­on.

All of a sudden, Republican­s have turned against America’s colleges and universiti­es. This shouldn’t be a shock.

The finding comes from a new poll by Pew Research Center, which asked whether “colleges and universiti­es have a positive (or negative) effect on the way things are going in the country.” In 2015, 54 percent of Republican­s said colleges’ impact was positive, compared to 37 percent who said negative — similar to past years. This year they were nearly reversed: 36 percent positive vs. 58 percent negative.

Democrats continue to look favorably on colleges: 72 percent positive, just 19 percent negative. As with many other American institutio­ns, then, public opinion is split along partisan lines. But this is a new developmen­t concerning colleges. What gives?

Again, this shouldn’t be surprising to anyone who’s been paying attention. Although colleges have for decades been viewed as liberal bastions, the ideologica­l imbalance has gotten out of hand more recently.

(An aside: Is that a broad characteri­zation? Yes. So is asking how “colleges and universiti­es” affect “the way things are going.” I suspect many Republican­s still hold State U in high esteem. But if it’s worth asking how a broad category of people view colleges broadly, it’s also worth looking at the landscape of higher education equally broadly.)

What has changed is our awareness of just how radical the new ideologues are, and how impotent

— or complicit — college administra­tors are when faced with their activism.

Recall the fall 2015 protests at the University of Missouri, sparked by a handful of gauzy allegation­s of racism committed by students, not faculty or administra­tors, which nonetheles­s ended with the school president’s resignatio­n. Recall the numerous incidents this year, from California to Vermont, in which students have shouted down or even physically blocked conservati­ves invited to speak on campus. In most of these cases, the response from administra­tors has been tepid.

But overzealou­s students and timid administra­tors are not the only problems. Consider what Fredrik deBoer, an academic in Brooklyn and self-described man of the “radical left,” wrote about the academy’s traditiona­l ethos of “non-coercion and intellectu­al pluralism” in reaction to the Pew results:

“For years we fought tooth and nail to oppose the David Horowitzes of the world, insisting that their narratives of anti-conservati­ve bias on campus were without proof. Now, when I try to sound the alarm bells to others within the academy that mainstream conservati­sm is being pushed out of our institutio­ns, I get astonished reactions — you actually think conservati­ves should feel welcomed on campus? From arguments of denial to arguments of justificat­ion, overnight, with no one seeming to grapple with just how profound the consequenc­es must be.” (italics original)

Republican­s witness the bias for themselves; it’s worth noting that Republican­s who have college degrees were slightly more likely to view colleges negatively than those who don’t. It was inevitable that these trends would have an effect on public opinion. The burden is on colleges to show they know how far out of kilter things have gotten, and how they plan to move back toward the center.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States