The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Braves don’t regret skipping roof despite rain-delayed home games

- By Tim Tucker ttucker@ajc.com

With SunTrust Park experienci­ng its 11th rain-delayed game Tuesday night, you might be thinking: Tell me again why the Braves didn’t put a retractabl­e roof on their new stadium. Glad you asked, if you did. The Braves considered putting a retractabl­e roof on SunTrust Park, but, “I think it was a relatively brief conversati­on,” Derek Schiller, the team’s president of business, said during the ballpark’s constructi­on last year.

“Early on, we discussed a facility that might include a roof, but there are a variety of reasons we didn’t go down that path,” Schiller said at the time. “Some of it is cost. It is cost-prohibitiv­e. But at the end of the day, the real reason is we believe baseball is an outdoor sport.

“I think our fans would prefer to be outside in the elements, albeit with as many of the amenities and protection­s and things like the canopy that we can make part of the design . ... We all felt watching Braves baseball was better outdoors than indoors.”

By some estimates, a retractabl­e roof would have added $150 million to the cost of building SunTrust Park, plus increased annual operating costs. And a roof as complex and problemati­c to build as, say, the one on the Falcons’ new stadium might have added hundreds of millions of dollars more than that.

So a roof migh t have turned the Braves’ $672 million stadium into, say, an $822 million stadium. Or more. If the Braves had wanted to add a roof, they presumably would have had to pay for it themselves, since Cobb County’s considerab­le contributi­on already seemed maxed out.

Instead, for the amount of money the Falcons are spending on the roof for Mercedes-Benz Stadium, the Braves were able to build much of The Battery, the mixed-use developmen­t adjacent to SunTrust Park.

Speaking of the Falcons: You might recall they didn’t want a roof on their new stadium to begin with, either.

For several years, the Falcons pursued the goal of building a roofless, open-air stadium for their games and leaving the Georgia Dome standing for other events that required a roof, such as the SEC Championsh­ip game and Final Four.

I n April 2012, that dual-stadium goal was deemed financiall­y unfeasible and a retractabl­e roof was added to the Falcons’ plans.

 ?? KEVIN C. COX / GETTY IMAGES ?? Eleven games at SunTrust Park have had rain delays. Team executives briefly considered a retractabl­e roof, but it was “cost-prohibitiv­e”.
KEVIN C. COX / GETTY IMAGES Eleven games at SunTrust Park have had rain delays. Team executives briefly considered a retractabl­e roof, but it was “cost-prohibitiv­e”.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States