Effects of ‘bathroom bill’ linger in North Carolina, says lawsuit

Replacement law called ‘a wolf in sheep’s clothing.’

The law that replaced North Carolina’s notorious “bathroom bill” sports a new look but maintains LGBT discrimination and prevents transgender people from using restrooms matching their gender identity, according to a lawsuit Friday.

The lawsuit renews a high-profile legal battle that has thrust North Carolina into the center of the national debate over LGBT rights. The state took the “bathroom bill” off the books in late March after a yearlong backlash that hurt North Carolina’s reputation and caused businesses and sports leagues to back out of lucrative events and projects.

But lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union and Lambda Legal said the replacement law, known as H.B. 142, continues the harms of its predecessor.

“Legislators were forced to rewrite the law,” ACLU lawyer Chris Brook told reporters Friday. “But make no mistake ... H.B. 142 is a wolf in sheep’s clothing crafted to keep discrimination intact but sporting a new look.”

The compromise earlier this year between Republican legislative leaders and Democrats led by Gov. Roy Cooper eliminated the “bathroom bill” requirement that transgender people use restrooms in many public buildings corresponding to the sex on their birth certificates.

But the new law makes clear that only the General Assembly — not local government or school officials — can make rules for public restrooms from now on. Local governments are also prohibited from enacting new nondiscrimination ordinances for workplaces, hotels and restaurants until December 2020.

“The vacuum purposefully created by H.B. 142 in effect maintains the ban of (the previous law) and encourages discrimination by both government and private entities and individuals,” the lawsuit said. “The law offers no guidance to anyone except by implication and makes it impossible for a reasonable person who is transgender to know which restroom they can legally use.”

The ambiguity is compounded by statements from Republican lawmakers that the new law would meet the same goals as the “bathroom bill,” according to the lawsuit. It cites a statement from House Speaker Tim Moore that the replacement law ensures that “persons of the opposite sex cannot go into designated multi-occupancy restrooms” and could face criminal trespassing charges.