The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

White House gives mixed signals on its strategy for health care

Some see mischief; administra­tion says it is focused on bill.

- By Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar and Ken Thomas

WASHINGTON — Repeal and replace “Obamacare.” Just repeal. Or let it fail — maybe with a little nudge. President Donald Trump has sent a flurry of mixed messages, raising questions about the White House strategy on health care.

Democrats say Trump’s confusing signals are part of a strategy to destabiliz­e the Affordable Care Act, as a way to force recalcitra­nt Republican­s in Congress to repeal former President Barack Obama’s signature law.

White House officials say they remain focused on trying to get a bill passed and have declined to delve deeply into their health care options if legislatio­n fails.

“The White House does not have a strategy,” said health industry consultant Robert Laszewski, an “Obamacare” critic who believes the administra­tion is at a loss.

Another theory: Trump may have to cut his losses and take modest steps to sustain subsidized insurance markets if the GOP’s legislativ­e drive fails. A Senate vote is planned Tuesday.

Ironically, insurance markets don’t appear to be on the verge of collapse as Trump and other Republican­s keep saying. About 10 million people have individual policies under that part of “Obamacare.”

“Improving but fragile,” is how Standard & Poor’s analyst Deep Banerjee describes the insurance exchanges. “We expect on average for insurers to hit break even” in 2017.

And Obama’s Medicaid expansion —which provides coverage to another 11 million— is unaffected by problems on the exchanges.

Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., who has previously worked with Republican­s on health care, sees a White House bent on mischief.

“They are doing everything they can to stoke the fires of uncertaint­y, which is what really damages this law,” Wyden said. “You can say ‘I’d like to change the law,’ but you don’t just say ‘We’re going to do everything in our power to undermine a law that is on the books.’ This is about being willing to hurt people in order to get a political advantage, and I’ve never seen a president doing it in such a brazen way.”

The Trump administra­tion says what’s really hurting people is higher premiums and dwindling choice under “Obamacare.” Some major insurers have bailed out or scaled back their offerings on the exchanges, leaving many consumers with limited options.

But Democrats cite the administra­tion’s pullback of open enrollment ads early this year as evidence of “sabotage,” along with the recently disclosed terminatio­n of federal contracts for sign-up assistance in 18 cities. Also the 2018 enrollment season has been shortened to 45 days, about half the time previously provided.

And the Health and Human Services Department has posted internet videos of small business owners blaming high insurance costs on “Obamacare.” Those videos are “important and educationa­l testimonia­ls” that show the ACA has made affordable insurance “impossible for millions of Americans,” said agency spokeswoma­n Alleigh Marre.

It definitely looks like a hostile takeover, said economist Joe Antos of the business-oriented American Enterprise Institute, “but usually with a hostile takeover there is a business objective that is relatively clear.” In this case, he said, objectives seem to shift.

Laszewski, the consultant, put it this way: “First, it was the Democrats will come begging (Trump) to fix it. Then it was repeal and replace, then it was just repeal, and now it is repeal and replace again.”

The most immediate question is whether the administra­tion will continue payments to insurers on subsidies that reduce deductible­s and copayments for consumers with modest incomes. “Cost-sharing reductions” total $7 billion a year.

The payments are embroiled in a lawsuit brought by House Republican­s over whether the ACA specifical­ly included a congressio­nal appropriat­ion for the money, as required under the U.S. Constituti­on. Elsewhere, the ACA text plainly says the government “shall” make the payments. But Trump recently suggested to GOP senators he might just stop.

“We pay hundreds of millions of dollars a month in subsidy, that the courts don’t even want us to pay,” the president said. “And when those payments stop, it (Obamacare) stops immediatel­y.”

 ?? EVAN VUCCI / ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? President Donald Trump, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (left) and House Speaker Paul Ryan have had little legislativ­e success in their efforts to produce changes to the nation’s health care law.
EVAN VUCCI / ASSOCIATED PRESS President Donald Trump, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (left) and House Speaker Paul Ryan have had little legislativ­e success in their efforts to produce changes to the nation’s health care law.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States