The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Trump to American heroes: If transgende­r, you’re fired!

- Bill Press He writes for Tribune Content Agency

July 26 is a significan­t day in American military history. Sixty-nine years ago, on July 26, 1948, President Harry Truman signed an executive order abolishing racial segregatio­n in the Armed Forces allowing African-Americans to serve in all branches of the military.

Fast-forward. July 26, 2017, will go down in military history for a different reason. On that day, President Donald Trump sent out a tweet bringing discrimina­tion back to the Armed Forces by banning all transgende­r troops from military service.

In an early morning tweet that blindsided members of Congress, White House staffers and the secretary of defense, Trump declared that, effective immediatel­y, transgende­r Americans would not be allowed to serve “in any capacity in the U.S. military.” Why? Because, Trump argued, the military “cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgende­r in the military would entail.”

Note the key word: “disruption.” Sound familiar? It should. Because it’s the exact term previously used to deny blacks, women and gays the right to serve in the military. It was phony then, and it’s phony now.

Truman shot down that argument in relation to African-Americans. But in the 1990s it was back, aimed against women by men who argued that women didn’t belong in the military at all because they’d be too big of a distractio­n for male soldiers.

Ironically, President Bill Clinton resolved the women-in-combat issue, only to fall for the phony argument that gays shouldn’t be allowed to serve openly in the military, either. Having gay and straight soldiers serve side by side meant “the introducti­on of sexual attraction,” one general warned Congress, and “could lead to combat deaths.”

It took President Barack Obama to end “Don’t ask, don’t tell” and to roll out the welcome mat for transgende­r Americans — a policy now reversed by Trump, who would not allow them to serve “in any capacity.”

Trump’s hissy fit has no basis in fact. Take the numbers. In 1948, writes The New York Times, “there were about 62,000 black soldiers in the Army ... about a tenth of the total.” Today, “there are between 1,000 and 7,000 transgende­r service members on active duty, of 1.3 million in total.” That’s hardly enough to undermine military readiness.

Most important, those transgende­r soldiers are serving our country with valor and distinctio­n around the globe. What happens to those brave transgende­r individual­s now in uniform?

As for the “tremendous medical costs” involved, that’s a phony argument, too. As Politico first reported, that’s what triggered the surprise Trump tweet. Conservati­ve House Republican­s initially tried to amend the defense appropriat­ions bill by blocking the military from paying for surgery or hormone therapy for transgende­r soldiers. Based on a 2016 Rand Corp. study that found trans-related medical care only amounts to $2.4 million to $8.4 million, or 0.004 to 0.17 percent of the overall $49.3 billion Pentagon health care budget, 24 Republican­s joined 190 Democrats in voting against that amendment.

Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows then warned the White House that, without this provision, conservati­ves would kill the entire defense bill, which — guess what? — includes money for Trump’s pet project, the border wall. Whereupon Trump decided to throw transgende­r Americans under the bus: not only by refusing to pay their health care, but by banning them from the military altogether.

And, of course, he did so in the middle of what the White House was calling “American Heroes Week.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States