The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Evans right, many workers are classified incorrectl­y

- By Jon Greenberg PolitiFact Georgia

There are “thousands of Georgia workers that are misclassif­ied as independen­t contractor­s,” who lose benefits, including health care. — Georgia Rep. Stacey Evans on Saturday, Aug. 5, 2017 in a statement sent to the Atlanta Journal Constituti­on

With health care policy in limbo in Washington, the politician­s who would like to be Georgia’s next governor are staking out their own policy outlines. Democratic State Rep. Stacey Evans favors expanding Medicaid, but said the state could take other action as well.

We decided to check Evans’ number of misclassif­ied workers, and found she’s on safe ground.

Some businesses avoid treating workers as employees by calling them independen­t contractor­s. The person might work only for that one business, use equipment the business provides and do exactly what the business tells him or her to do, and yet be labeled as if the person was in business for himself.

The advantage for companies is they avoid paying a number of employment taxes, including Medicare, Social Security and unemployme­nt insurance. If they offer health insurance, they would sidestep that too.

Georgia’s Department of Labor says, “Independen­t contractor status depends on the underlying nature of the work relationsh­ip.”

In a recent case, a state administra­tive judge ruled that a man who drove for a Georgia limousine service was actually an employee and not an independen­t contractor, as the company (and the state Department of Labor) claimed. The company had required the man to set up his own limited liability corporatio­n, but the ruling said that made no difference.

The driver used a company car, and he was “given direction as to where to drive, when to drive, how to drive, how often to drive, and the rates to charge customers.”

The judge called this an “extreme” case of misclassif­ication. Evans’ campaign communicat­ions director Seth Clark said she relied on a 2015 Georgia Senate study for the number of misclassif­ied workers.

That report said an accurate estimate was difficult because the state had never done a complete study, as other states have.

However, the state Department of Labor reported its inspectors had found “over 4,000 misclassif­ied employees,” across about 1,700 businesses in 2014. In 2015, it found about 1,500 misclassif­ied workers at 1,800 firms, and in 2016, the number was about 3,000 out of 2,400 firms audited.

Complaints by workers and random selection by inspectors trigger audits. The data show that most audits lead to the discovery of a misclassif­ied worker.

The department told us that currently, it lists nearly 235,000 employers. The review of about 2,400 represents a small fraction, about 1 percent. ”

At the national level, the most recent numbers come from the Government Accountabi­lity Office. Its review of IRS data from 200810 found that worker classifica­tion problems represente­d 20 percent, or over 3 million cases, of noncomplia­nce issues.

It’s important to note that simply being classified as an employee is no guarantee of health coverage.

Companies with fewer than 51 employees face no penalty if they fail to offer insurance under the Affordable Care Act.

Our ruling

A state Senate study said there is no solid estimate of the number of misclassif­ied workers, but state investigat­ors had found between 1,500 and 4,000 instances in each of the past three years, or an average of 2,800 per year.

That is based on a review of about 1 percent of businesses, and most reviews reveal a misclassif­ied worker. States that have conducted more systematic studies found misclassif­ication rates in the range of 10 to 20 percent.

The 2,800 average likely misses many instances, and it’s a relatively small number, but it’s enough to support Evans’ statement.

The connection to health care is less clear, because many small employers don’t offer health insurance, nor are they required to.

But Evans was careful to include health care as one of several benefits, and her claim doesn’t hinge on that element.

With that caveat, we rate this claim Mostly True.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States