The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

EpiPen maker finalizes $465 million payout to feds

Case involves alleged Medicaid overcharge­s for allergy injectors.

- By Linda A. Johnson

TRENTON, N.J. — EpiPen maker Mylan has finalized a $465 million government agreement settling allegation­s it overbilled Medicaid for its emergency allergy injectors for a decade — charges brought after rival Sanofi filed a whistleblo­wer lawsuit and tipped off the government.

It’s the second settlement with the Department of Justice that Mylan has made since 2009 for allegedly overchargi­ng the government for its medicines.

A prominent senator and a watchdog group both criticized the latest settlement for being far smaller than the amount Medicaid was overcharge­d.

Mylan NV, technicall­y based in England but with operationa­l headquarte­rs near Pittsburgh, became a poster child for pharmaceut­ical industry greed for hiking the list price of EpiPens repeatedly. It raised the price per pair from $94 in 2007 to $608 last year, while experts estimate it costs less than $10 to produce one EpiPen.

Last September, a House panel grilled Mylan CEO Heather Bresch about the skyrocketi­ng cost of the devices, which patients inject in the thigh to stop a runaway allergic reaction to foods such as nuts and eggs or insect bites and stings.

On Thursday, the Department of Justice disclosed that its EpiPen case began when Sanofi-Aventis US LLC filed a lawsuit against Mylan under the False Claims Act.

The law allows individual­s and companies to sue on behalf of the government over improper charges to government programs and to receive a share of any money recovered. Sanofi is to receive about $38.7 million. The federal government and all 50 states will split the bulk of the settlement.

Sanofi made a rival auto-injector called Auvi-Q. The French drugmaker recalled nearly 500,000 of its devices from the market in 2015, due to some not administer­ing the correct dose of the hormone epinephrin­e to reverse a severe allergic attack.

EpiPens have long dominated the market and continue to do so, between their name recognitio­n and deals Mylan has made to get preferable or exclusive coverage from insurers and prescripti­on benefit managers.

According to the Justice Department, Mylan paid Medicaid, the joint federal-state health program for the poor and disabled, too-low rebates for EpiPens by improperly classifyin­g the brandname product as a generic. Drugmakers are required to pay Medicaid rebates of 13 percent for generic products it purchases, versus a 23.1 percent rebate for brand-name drugs, which cost far more.

EpiPen has been incorrectl­y classified since late 1997 as a generic product under Medicaid. Mylan acquired rights to EpiPen in 2007 and didn’t change its classifica­tion.

In addition, Mylan wasn’t paying Medicaid a second rebate required whenever a brandname drug’s price rises more than inflation, which averaged less than 2 percent a year from 2007 through 2016.

 ?? AP ?? According to the Justice Department, Mylan paid Medicaid too-low rebates for EpiPens by improperly classifyin­g the brand-name product as a generic. Drugmakers are required to pay Medicaid rebates of 13 percent for generic products it purchases, versus a 23.1 percent rebate for brand-name drugs.
AP According to the Justice Department, Mylan paid Medicaid too-low rebates for EpiPens by improperly classifyin­g the brand-name product as a generic. Drugmakers are required to pay Medicaid rebates of 13 percent for generic products it purchases, versus a 23.1 percent rebate for brand-name drugs.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States