Election could reshape issue of school vouchers

Former House Speaker Tip O’Neill famously observed, “All politics is local.”

We have a particularly sharp example in an upcoming school board election in Colorado that has far-reaching national implications.

At issue is the Blaine Amendment, which appears in constitutions of 38 states. It prohibits appropriation of public funds to any religiously affiliated institution. The bottom line is the same in each state — no public money for anything having to do with religion.

The Blaine Amendment issue in Colorado is about parental school choice.

In 2011, the Douglas County Board of Education unanimously voted to enact a school voucher program, establishing 500 vouchers that student recipients could use at any private school of their choice, including religious schools.

The program was challenged by the nation’s usual anti-religion crusaders — the ACLU and Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

The legal challenge made its way to the Colorado Supreme Court, which ruled in 2015 against the voucher program. According to the court, the vouchers, which are financed with public funds, violate the Blaine Amendment when used by students to attend religiously affiliated schools. According to the court, 9 out of 10 students intending to use the vouchers planned to attend religious schools.

Now, elections are being held for a new school board in Douglas County.

If a pro-school choice board is elected, the legal fight over vouchers and the Blaine Amendment will continue and most likely will wind up at the U.S. Supreme Court. If an anti-voucher school board is elected, the voucher issue, for the time being, will die.

A Supreme Court decision finding the Blaine Amendment an unconstitutional barrier to vouchers will nullify a major obstacle to school choice in the 38 states that have these amendments. Recent Supreme Court decisions suggest that indeed the Blaine Amendment obstacle would be demolished if the Supreme Court hears this case.

In Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, the court decided in 2002 that use of vouchers for religious schools does not violate the First Amendment. The court argued that vouchers enable private choice by parents. Thus, there is no direct government support of religious schools.

History is clear that Blaine’s motives were not about religious freedom. It was an anti-Catholic initiative, meant to block the use of public funds for Catholic schools.

At the time, public schools weren’t free of religion. Rather, the values defining public school curricula were Protestant.

Today, the values transmitted in public schools are based on secular humanism.

Why should Christian families, or families of any religion, be forced to swallow this?

The only approach to education today that is consistent with the Constitution’s guarantee of religious freedom is parental school choice, allowing parents to educate their children according to their own values.

Let’s hope those who can make a difference in this election will elect a pro-voucher board, for the good of Douglas Country and for the good of the nation.