The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

WHY 17 APS OFFICERS WERE DISCIPLINE­D AFTER TEST

GBI acknowledg­es vagueness in rules, plans rewrite.

- By Vanessa McCray vanessa.mccray@ajc.com

The Atlanta Public Schools Police Department discipline­d 17 officers after a probe into possible cheating on a state-administer­ed test, and now the vague test rules are being rewritten.

The district, in a statement released Friday by spokesman Ian Smith, said the review is coming to a close and the school resource officers were discipline­d “in a fair and appropriat­e manner.”

Seventeen officers admitted to receiving answers, including some from a dispatcher, on an openbook, multiple-choice exam administer­ed by the Georgia Bureau of Investigat­ion.

APS referenced a recent letter from GBI that acknowledg­es the vagueness of test-taking rules. The incident has prompted the GBI to begin rewriting and clarifying its expectatio­ns for those who take the test.

“The language will make crystal clear that although collaborat­ion during the training modules is acceptable, sharing answers on the test is NOT permitted. That has always been the requiremen­t,” said GBI spokeswoma­n Nelly Miles, in a written statement Friday.

In October, APS police Chief Ronald Applin asked an outside law enforcemen­t agency to look into officers who took a GBI-managed Criminal Justice Informatio­n System test. The exam is required to access a database of millions of confidenti­al, criminal and driver’s license records.

APS officers and other test-takers had to certify that the com-

pletion of the course work is their “sole product” and “any discussion of these courses with others is not permitted.”

GBI officials met with school district leaders Dec. 4 to review the matter. D. Scott Dutton, GBI deputy director for investigat­ions, wrote in a letter this week to Applin, “it was learned that collaborat­ion is acceptable and promoted within the study modules” by trainers.

He wrote that students are allowed to confer with each other and coordinato­rs while going through the study guides and manuals.

“Additional­ly, the training materials and tests are considered ‘open book’ potentiall­y leaving vagueness which leads to open interpreta­tion,” Dutton wrote.

The test rules will be rewritten “to clarify expectatio­ns and clearly state when collaborat­ion is acceptable and when it is not,” he wrote.

APS released a sample of a “letter of direction” that will go into the files of some officers involved. The letter states that recipients “did not follow” guidance included in the test-certificat­ion process.

“Please be advised that it is our expectatio­n that you follow the written directions for all future exams and that you are truthful in anything that you certify or acknowledg­e during your course of employment with the district,” the letter stated.

The school district will maintain testing requiremen­ts it set during the investigat­ion, such as having a proctor oversee test-takers.

In November, APS sent the findings of the investigat­ion to the Fulton County District Attorney’s Office, which would determine if the incident should be prosecuted as a crime. The district attorney’s office could not be reached for comment Friday.

The school district reported that one additional officer involved in a different infraction has resigned, and that case has been referred to the district attorney.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States