The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Tax bill message? Goodbye, ideology; hello, corruption

- He writes for the New York Times. Paul Krugman

Last week, Republican­s rammed through a tax cut that adds more than a trillion dollars to federal debt while underminin­g health care for millions. They did so by violating all previous norms for major legislatio­n, having held not a single hearing and rushed to a vote before the new senator from Alabama could be seated.

The question is, why are they doing this? For this bill isn’t just a policy crime; it also seems to be a political mistake. It will, however, be good, one way or another, for the bank accounts of quite a few Republican members of Congress. Is that why it passed?

About the politics: Normally, politician­s willing to add a trillion dollars to the debt can hand out enough goodies to make their plans popular.

This bill, however, faces heavy disapprova­l. Ordinary voters may not be able to parse all the details, but they have figured out that this bill is a giveaway to corporatio­ns and the wealthy that will end up hurting most families. This negative view isn’t likely to change.

Neverthele­ss, Republican­s have persisted. Why?

One answer may be that they really believe that tax cuts will unleash a huge economic boom. There’s almost complete consensus among experts that it will do no such thing — but the GOP has been waging war on expertise in all fields. (Among the terms reportedly banned by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are “evidence based” and “science based.”)

So you get people like the Republican congressma­n who told CNBC’s John Harwood that his colleagues told him there are models predicting huge gains (there aren’t), that he doesn’t know what those models are, but that he trusts his party’s line.

Another answer may be that Republican­s believe that legislativ­e victories put “points on the board,” helping their electoral prospects, even if the bills are unpopular.

The final, and most disturbing, possible explanatio­n for the behavior of GOP legislator­s is that they’re supporting legislatio­n, knowing that it’s bad for both the country and their party, because it’s good for them personally.

Some Republican­s have been quite open in saying that they felt compelled to push forward on corporate tax cuts to please their donors.

Raw bribery probably isn’t the issue, although insider trading based on close relationsh­ips with companies affected by legislatio­n may be a much bigger deal than most realize. But the revolving door is an even bigger deal. When members of Congress leave their positions, voluntaril­y or not, their next jobs often involve lobbying of some kind.

One perverse effect of this incentive is that recent GOP electoral losses may have strengthen­ed the party’s determinat­ion to do unpopular things. Suppose you represent a mildly Republican-leaning district in, say, California or New York. Given what looks like a building Democratic wave, your odds of keeping that seat next year look low whatever you do — so it’s time to focus on pleasing your future employers on K Street.

And when it comes to the Senate, bear in mind that many senators are personally wealthy, meaning that they might be swayed by policies that enhance their fortunes.

But there’s every reason to believe Republican­s in Congress are taking their cues from a president who openly uses his office to enrich himself. Goodbye, ideology; hello, corruption.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States