The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Trump fires HIV/AIDS council members

- By Dan Klepal dan.klepal@ajc.com The Washington Post and AJC staff writer Johnny Edwards contribute­d to this report.

Two Atlantans were among the final 10 members of the Presidenti­al Advisory Council on HIV/ AIDS who were fired en masse.

Two Atlantans were among the final 10 members of the Presidenti­al Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS who were fired en masse by the Trump administra­tion Wednesday through a form letter delivered by FedEx.

Patrick Sullivan, a professor and epidemiolo­gist at Emory University, and Oliver Clyde Allen III, an author and pastor at The Vision Church of Atlanta, were both appointed by President Obama.

The firings came months after a half-dozen other members resigned in protest of the Trump administra­tion’s position on health policies, including its desire to repeal the Affordable Care Act.

Sullivan, who was appointed to a four-year term in May 2016, told The Atlanta Journal-Constituti­on that the notice was respectful, thanked him for his service and “made clear the terminatio­n was effective immediatel­y.” He called the letter “unexpected.”

“We certainly have been vocal that repeal of the Affordable Care Act would worsen health and increase new HIV infections,” Sullivan said. “One of our recommenda­tions was to endorse the national HIV/AIDS strategy, which was developed by the Obama administra­tion ... but reflected the work of a very diverse group of people.”

“Many of us considered that a national road map, and thought of endorsing it as an opportunit­y for leadership.” Sullivan said “it’s hard to say” if that recommenda­tion led to the firings.

The council, known by the acronym PACHA, has advised the White House on HIV/AIDS policies since its founding in 1995. Members, who are not paid, offer recommenda­tions to the five-year plan responding to the epidemic.

The group is designed to include “doctors, members of industry, members of the community and, very importantl­y, people living with HIV,” said Scott Schoettes, an attorney with the LGBT rights organizati­on Lambda Legal. “Without it, you lose the community voice in policy making.”

Schoettes was among six members who quit in June, and he went out with a fiery commentary in Newsweek: “The Trump Administra­tion has no strategy to address the ongoing HIV/AIDS epidemic, seeks zero input from experts to formulate HIV policy, and — most concerning — pushes legislatio­n that will harm people living with HIV and halt or reverse important gains made in the fight against this disease,” he wrote.

“We tried to stick it out,” Schoettes told The Washington Post on Friday. But, he said, the “writing was on the wall.”

“The tipping point for me was the president’s approach to the Affordable Care Act,” Schoettes said. “It is of great importance for people living with HIV like myself.”

The council’s executive director, Kaye Hayes, confirmed in a statement that all remaining council members had received letters Wednesday “informing them that the administra­tion was terminatin­g their appointmen­ts.” The deadline for applicatio­ns to the new council is Jan. 2.

“Changing the makeup of federal advisory committee members is a common occurrence during administra­tion changes,” Hayes said in the statement. “The Obama administra­tion dismissed the George W. Bush administra­tion appointees to PACHA in order to bring in new voices. All PACHA members are eligible to apply to serve on the new council that will be convened in 2018.”

Nicholas Carlisle, a council member and executive director of the Southern AIDS Coalition, agreed that it’s not unpreceden­ted for a new president to remove an entire council. But it’s more typical for members to serve staggered terms and rotate off gradually, he said.

“To be frank, it is a bit strange,” Carlisle said. “It felt very unceremoni­ous to get a letter in the mail over the holidays with a short amount of time to reapply.

“I think there’s no way to know why President Trump decided to do this at this time. Did it take a year to get around to it? Was it retaliatio­n for some of the recommenda­tions? Was it a desire to stack the council with people are who like-minded?”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States