The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Senator: FBI did not save 2 officials’ texts

Agent, lawyer were involved in probes of Clinton, Trump.

- By Devlin Barrett

The FBI did not retain messages exchanged by two senior officials ... for a five-month period ending the day a special counsel was appointed, according to a congressio­nal letter.

WASHINGTON — The FBI did not retain text messages exchanged by two senior officials involved in the probes of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump for a five-month period ending the day a special counsel was appointed to investigat­e possible connection­s between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to a new congressio­nal letter.

The letter from Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee, to FBI Director Christophe­r A. Wray indicates the Justice Department has turned over to lawmakers a new batch of texts from senior FBI agent Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page. The messages have not been made public.

As The Washington Post reported in December, Strzok was removed from the Trump probe after internal investigat­ors discovered he and Page, who were romantical­ly involved, exchanged anti-Trump, pro-Clinton texts during investigat­ions of both presidenti­al candidates. Later that month, the Justice Department provided Congress with hundreds of pages of messages. Republican­s said the texts revealed political bias at the bureau’s highest levels.

Johnson’s weekend letter said his committee received 384 pages of new Strzok-Page texts late Friday. The lawmaker is asking the FBI to explain in more detail why it “did not preserve text messages between Ms. Page and Mr. Strzok between approximat­ely December 14, 2016 and May 17, 2017.”

May 17 is a key date in the Russia probe: It’s the day Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein tapped Robert Mueller III as a special counsel to take over the investigat­ion.

An FBI spokesman declined to comment.

Much occurred during the months the Strzok-Page texts were not retained. ThenFBI Director James Comey met repeatedly with President Donald Trump, the Russia probe intensifie­d and began to focus on former national security adviser Michael Flynn and, in early May, Trump fired Comey.

The FBI previously informed the Justice Department that “many FBI-provided Samsung 5 mobile devices did not capture or store text messages due to misconfigu­ration issues related to rollouts, provisioni­ng, and software upgrades that conflicted with the FBI’s collection capabiliti­es,” as a Justice Department official told lawmakers in an earlier letter. As a result, it says, “data that should have been automatica­lly collected and retained for long-term storage and retrieval was not collected.”

Strzok’s and Page’s conduct are the subject of an investigat­ion by the Justice Department’s inspector general. Strzok was removed from Mueller’s team in July when Mueller was notified of the texts. Page left the team two weeks earlier for what officials have said were unrelated reasons.

Lawyers for the two did not immediatel­y respond to requests for comment Sunday.

Johnson’s letter quotes from a handful of the newly revealed text messages, including one from July 1, 2016, in which Page expresses disdain for then-Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch, who had just announced she would accept the charging recommenda­tions of career officials in the probe of Clinton’s use of a private email server while she was secretary of state. Lynch made that decision after she came under fire for meeting with former president Bill Clinton on the tarmac of an airport in Phoenix.

“Yeah, it’s a real profile in courag(e), since she knows no charges will be brought,” Page texted to Strzok.

By that point, multiple news outlets had reported that charges were not likely to be filed in the Clinton case. Days later, Clinton was formally interviewe­d by the FBI, and Comey announced in a news conference on July 5, 2016, that he would not be recommendi­ng any criminal charges in the case.

The new texts also indicate that Strzok and Page occasional­ly emailed each other using private accounts, rather than government ones, according to the letter, though one of those texts suggests that may have been unintentio­nal.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States