The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Military officers question threat communicat­ions

Emails show frustratio­ns after missile warning.

- By Dan Lamothe

The Hawaii government’s erroneous warning of an imminent ballistic missile attack caused confusion at U.S. military facilities, frustratin­g senior U.S. military officers and causing them to question procedures for communicat­ing with state officials, according to emails obtained by The Washington Post.

The emails were sent in succession after thousands of people received a text-message warning Jan. 13 that prompted hysteria in parts of Hawaii. The U.S. military had no role in sending the mistaken message, but nonetheles­s had to deal with the fallout.

“Apparently, they were getting ready to do a drill when the ‘drill’ part was lost in translatio­n,” Adm. Harry Harris, the chief of U.S. Pacific Command, wrote to Gen. Joseph Dunford Jr., chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff an hour after the message was sent. “Totally uncoordina­ted with us of course.”

The emails were obtained late last week through the Freedom of Informatio­n Act. They detail efforts by the U.S. military to address what happened, gather informatio­n internally and answer questions to better handle crises in the future. They make no mention of President Trump or White House staff, who declined to address the issue and referred to the gaffe as a “state issue.”

The warning, sent to people’s cellphones at 8:07 a.m. local time, was issued by an employee who did not realize a drill was underway, a federal investigat­ion found.

“BALLISTIC MISSILE THREAT INBOUND TO HAWAII,” the warning said. “SEEK IMMEDIATE SHELTER. THIS IS NOT A DRILL.”

It took the Hawaii government 38 minutes to issue a follow-up text message indicating the alert had been sent in error, though officials did attempt to assuage concerns through social media.

The employee who posted the message was fired. An investigat­ion found that he thought the threat was real, and had made similar mistakes in the past.

U.S. Pacific Command began responding to media questions about the alert by 8:23 a.m., saying there was no threat and state officials would issue a correction. Harris’s email to Dunford and other senior Pentagon officers indicated the notificati­on system “worked as we hoped it would,” and that Pacific Command had several tasks to do.

“There will be heavy press play here, for sure, which we’ll handle for those questions which concern PACOM forces,” Harris wrote. “Will also work with the State of Hawaii and internal to PACOM - am sure there are lessons learned where we can improve.”

However, there was “a lot of explaining by the State of Hawaii to do,” Harris added.

Dunford’s response was short: “Tracking all Harry... thanks,” he wrote. “Safe travels.”

The email to Dunford was forwarded a short time later to other senior members of Pacific Command’s staff, prompting conversati­on about what exactly state officials needed to fix.

Andrew Singer, a retired admiral who is now Harris’ deputy director for intelligen­ce, wrote to Air Force Maj. Gen. Kevin Schneider, Harris’ chief of staff, that the state “has a lot more than the alert system to work on.” It is unclear what he was alluding to; parts of his email are redacted.

“Happened to be in Yoga class when one of the ladies blurted out missile attack and ran out followed by most others,” Singer wrote. “Looking about town most just kept pursing [sic] getting their coffee or Malasadas,” he added, referring to a doughnut-like pastry.

Schneider responded a short time later agreeing with Singer, saying that there is “lots of work to be done on the communicat­ions piece.”

Harris also emailed the top Air Force officer in the Pacific, Gen. Terrence O’Shaughness­y, asking for additional informatio­n about a warning broadcast on base at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickham.

“Just for my education and edificatio­n, when the Big Voice went off at Pearl Harbor-Hickham this morning, there was no indication that this was a drill; in fact just the opposite,” Harris wrote. “So, what happens on the flight line, and what message, if any was passed to aircraft in the air?”

O’Shaughness­y’s responses are partially redacted, but he told Harris that afternoon in another email that air-traffic controller­s did not pass warnings of incoming ballistic missiles to aircraft or hold any aircraft on the ground.

“Thanks Shags,” Harris responded. “I think we’re going to learn a lot here. For ~ 25-30 minutes, this was a real alert, mistaken though it was.” Part of his email is redacted.

Pacific Command’s deputy commander, Army Lt. Gen. Bryan Fenton, followed up with Schneider that night, saying that Harris wanted additional informatio­n, including what ships, squadrons and ground units were told to do.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States