The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Voice of people must take highest priority

- By Clifford Humphrey Clifford Humphrey is a Warm Springs native who’s currently a PhD candidate in politics at Hillsdale College in Michigan.

It seems that these are the times that try Georgians’ souls. Reading the news recently, one has to ask, do corporatio­ns make the laws for Georgia these days? Do we not hold it to be self-evident that it is our inalienabl­e right as the people of Georgia to make to our own laws however we think best? Why then do we seem so willing to cede this sacred right to large corporatio­ns that do not share our same concerns as citizens?

In recent months we have heard a lot of debate surroundin­g our state’s bid to entice Amazon and its 50,000 jobs to Georgia. Amazon says its move will bring $5 billion to our economy. Critics, though, say after the incentive package is added up, taxpayers would essentiall­y be paying the living expenses of many wealthy, out-of-state executives.

The possible Amazon move has also entered political debates that have nothing to do with Amazon. Whether it is an “English-only” bill, the adoption bill, the religious liberty bill, or now the Delta tax-exemption, the opponents give the same criticism; they say Amazon won’t like it.

State Sen. Josh McKoon, who introduced or supported the “Englishonl­y” and Religious Freedom Restoratio­n Act bills, asserts that large corporatio­ns base their decisions on economic, not political, factors. But precedence begs to differ.

In 2016, after a majority of Georgians represente­d in the Legislatur­e voted for McKoon’s RFRA bill, many corporatio­ns, including Delta and CocaCola, condemned the bill, and some even threatened to abandon Georgia. Gov. Nathan Deal — pressured by Apple, Microsoft, and Twitter — vetoed it.

Of course, there is a legitimate place for the veto power, but if the concerns of these corporatio­ns, more than the general welfare of Georgians, persuaded the governor to use it, then it would appear that — contrary to the Declaratio­n of Independen­ce — our government derives its just powers from the consent of corporatio­ns, not from the people. This is the very definition of corporatis­m.

This political heresy has even led some in Georgia to consider trading their sacred right to self-government for a dubious monetary boon. The deluded city council of Stonecrest has prostitute­d itself by promising Amazon 345 acres of its citizens’ land

to Amazon, suggesting it name the newly acquired estate “Amazon, Georgia.” As if that was not low enough, the mayor of Stonecrest promised to seek legislatio­n making the Seattle-based CEO the unelected, permanent mayor of this new Georgia city.

Moreover, our own governor has made known the depths to which he is willing to bow to Amazon, promising that he would “call a special session so that we can make whatever statutory changes are required to accommodat­e a business opportunit­y of this magnitude.” Is he willing to make a deal that

Amazon cannot refuse, even if the people of Georgia probably would?

It should be clear by now that the political positions of corporate executives filter down throughout the whole company into their brand. This is as true for the conservati­ve Chick-fil-A and Hobby Lobby as it is for the liberal Target and Delta.

Let us not miss what is really at stake here: It matters not the cause a corporatio­n may espouse; it is plainly contrary to our most fundamenta­l political principles to let the voice of a corporatio­n outweigh that of the people themselves. The American

Revolution was justified on the basis that government is legitimate only by consent of the people. No corporatio­n — no matter how valuable — has a right to challenge that consent.

It may, in fact, be prudent to make great allowances to get Amazon to Georgia, and it may not be prudent to have an “English-only” bill or to remove Delta’s tax exemption. However, it is surely not fitting for a free people to cower or kowtow before any corporatio­n that threatens it with economic harm or demands sycophanti­c submission to the political preference­s of its executives. Corporatio­ns

sometimes employ thousands of employees, and they each are entitled to their own political opinions as citizens; let them speak for themselves, just like the rest of us.

To paraphrase Patrick Henry: Are jobs so dear or corporate revenues so sweet as to be purchased at the price of a loss of consent to our own laws? Forbid it, Almighty God!

There is only one question we should be asking when we make laws: Is this good for Georgia?

 ?? DAVID GOLDMAN / AP 2017 ?? A Delta Air Lines flight takes off from Hartsfield-Jackson airport in Atlanta. Corporatio­ns are entitled to their own political opinions as citizens — let them speak for themselves, just like the rest of us, writes Clifford Humphrey.
DAVID GOLDMAN / AP 2017 A Delta Air Lines flight takes off from Hartsfield-Jackson airport in Atlanta. Corporatio­ns are entitled to their own political opinions as citizens — let them speak for themselves, just like the rest of us, writes Clifford Humphrey.
 ??  ?? Clifford Humphrey
Clifford Humphrey

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States