The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Running for its future

After a turbulent year, race set to begin today.

- By Gavin Jenkins

In 45 years of existence, the Iditarod Trail Sled Dog Race — the annual 1,000-mile competitio­n in Alaska — has never experience­d a stretch as rough as this.

A documentar­y released last year, “Sled Dogs,” accused the race of cruelty toward its canine competitor­s. One of the Iditarod’s major sponsors severed ties in May. The race announced a substantia­l budget cut in September. The following month, the sport’s biggest star, Dallas Seavey, became embroiled in the Iditarod’s first doping scandal.

Now, just before its start today, the Iditarod’s board is under pressure following an independen­t report commission­ed by four top sponsors. The report suggested the board’s relationsh­ips with mushers and sponsors are so strained they threaten the race’s survival, and it proposed six of nine board members resign due to conflicts of interest with the race’s outcome. The Iditarod Official Finishers Club, a de facto mushers’ union, has since echoed those calls for resignatio­ns.

“It’s a very divided community at the moment,” said Craig Medred, an Alaska freelance journalist who has covered the Iditarod for 35 years and first published the report on his blog. “And given the outside threats they’re facing [from animal rights activists], it’s not a good place to be in.”

The Iditarod’s troubles have come amid a broad shift in public opinion about animal-centric sports and entertainm­ent. That cultural shift has not gone unnoticed by Iditarod officials, said Chas St. George, the Iditarod’s chief operations officer. In an interview, St. George acknowledg­ed the race needs to evolve, though he would not specify how.

“How this next generation feels, thinks emotionall­y about animals, that’s critical to us,” St. George said. “I guess there was a time in this race, and other events like this, where dogs were not as ‘human’ as they are today ... We need to evolve down that path because we think it’s important that we reflect the same kinds of values that any dog owner would have when it comes to caring for their family member. Because that’s what they are.”

Some Iditarod officials and mushers feared “Sled Dogs” would amplify animal activists’ long-standing criticism of the race in the same way “Blackfish,” which ran repeatedly on CNN in 2013, did for

SeaWorld.

“It freaked a lot of people out up here,” Medred said. “It was the ultimate in bad public relations.”

Iditarod officials and mushers denounced the movie, and St. George called it a biased and disingenuo­us depiction of the sport and its kennels. Neverthele­ss, the race announced in December all competitor­s will be required to meet the standards of a “Best Care” kennel management program to be implemente­d later this year. According to a statement, it will focus on issues including shelter, tethers, nutrition, socializat­ion, euthanasia and kennel size.

Colleen O’Brien, a spokeswoma­n for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, said her group sent “Sled Dogs” to the Iditarod’s sponsors in early 2017. Wells Fargo ended its 29-year sponsorshi­p of the race that spring, and the Iditarod publicly blamed PETA for the loss. A Wells Fargo spokesman attributed the decision to a marketing review.

Even before Wells Fargo’s departure, the race was $49,000 short of its sponsorshi­p goal and had depleted financial reserves. As a result, the Iditarod reduced its budget, which included shrinking its prize winnings for 2018 by approximat­ely $250,000. St. George said the budget cuts were nothing new; similar reductions occurred in 2010.

A doping scandal, however, is new for the Iditarod. The race began drug testing dogs in 1994, and it had a clean record until the end of last year’s race, when four

of Seavey’s dogs tested positive for tramadol, an opioid pain reliever. Seavey, 30, is a four-time Iditarod champion and was the youngest to win at 25.

Seavey was not punished. At the time, the Iditarod’s rules stated the race had to prove a musher gave dogs a banned substance. The board changed the rules in October, placing the burden of proof on the mushers. Seavey withdrew from this year’s race.

Seavey has said he is a victim of sabotage. His attorney recently told reporters an investigat­ion by a Louisiana-based toxicologi­st found the musher’s dogs were given tramadol two to four hours after the team finished the race, not while they were on the trail, as the Iditarod contends.

St. George said he’s optimistic this is a turning point for the race, calling it an opportunit­y to make changes that will attract a new generation of fans.

But Medred said although he thinks the Iditarod can outlast this period, he is not so confident it will evolve or grow its audience. And he sees risks. Four dogs died during last year’s race, the most since 2009, and Medred said he believes “all hell would break loose” if there are multiple deaths this year.

“Everyone’s happy to believe that bad things won’t happen. But I’ll tell you, every [Iditarod] vet I know thinks bad things could happen,” Medred said. More generally, he added, “Everywhere the Iditarod turns, it has a problem.”

 ?? MATT BUXTON / FAIRBANKS DAILY NEWS-MINER FILE ?? A documentar­y released last year accused Alaska’s famed Iditarod Trail Sled Dog Race of cruelty toward its canine competitor­s.
MATT BUXTON / FAIRBANKS DAILY NEWS-MINER FILE A documentar­y released last year accused Alaska’s famed Iditarod Trail Sled Dog Race of cruelty toward its canine competitor­s.
 ?? DIANA HAECKER / AP ?? Last year’s Iditarod champion Mitch Seavey poses with his dogs. His son, Dallas, was involved in a doping scandal after the race. Four of Dallas’ dogs tested positive for tramadol, an opioid pain reliever.
DIANA HAECKER / AP Last year’s Iditarod champion Mitch Seavey poses with his dogs. His son, Dallas, was involved in a doping scandal after the race. Four of Dallas’ dogs tested positive for tramadol, an opioid pain reliever.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States