The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Did we learn lesson from war in Iraq? It seems not

- Nicholas D. Kristof He writes for the New York Times.

“We will be greeted as liberators” upon invading Iraq, Vice President Dick Cheney counseled in 2003 on the eve of the war. He had already relayed a prediction that the streets in Basra and Baghdad are “sure to erupt in joy.”

President George W. Bush declared that there was “no doubt” that Iraq had weapons of mass destructio­n. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said that an invasion would be largely self-financing and that it would last “five days or five weeks or five months, but it certainly isn’t going to last any longer.”

So 15 years ago this week, the United States careered into one of the most cataclysmi­c, expensive and idiotic blunders of the past half-century: We invaded Iraq.

The financial cost alone to the United States will top $3 trillion, according to the estimates of the economists Joseph Stiglitz and Linda Bilmes, or about $24,000 per American household. Some 4,400 American soldiers died in Iraq, along with approximat­ely 500,000 Iraqis, according to a survey and academic study.

The war helped trigger the Syria war, the genocide against the Yazidi and Middle East Christians, the rise of the Islamic State, the strengthen­ing of Iran and a broader Sunni-Shiite conflict in the Middle East that will claim lives for years to come.

We should try to learn from these calamitous misjudgmen­ts, but I have a grim feeling in my belly, a bit like I had in the runup to the Iraq War, that we have a president who is leading us toward reckless, catastroph­ic conflict.

Actually, toward three reckless conflicts.

The first is not a bloody one: It’s a trade war. President Donald Trump’s tariffs and other trade actions mark the abandonmen­t of a 70-year American effort to lead the world to a more open trade system.

The second conflict that Trump is hurtling toward is with Iran. Unless he chooses some face-saving compromise, it looks as if Trump will pull out of the Iran nuclear deal by May 12.

The risk is that Iran responds by restarting its nuclear program. This would lead to soaring tensions, the possibilit­y of an Israeli strike on Iran, a risk of Saudi-Iranian conflict and a danger of war between the United States and Iran.

The final risk, of course, is a war with North Korea. We may have a reprieve for a couple of months if Trump’s face-to-face with Kim Jong Un goes ahead, but I think Americans are too reassured by the prospect of a summit meeting.

The basic problem: There’s almost no chance that North Korea will agree to the kind of verifiable denucleari­zation that Trump talks about. Then the danger is that if a summit collapses, there’s no room to restart the process with lower-level diplomats. At that point, the risk of military conflict soars because all alternativ­es seem exhausted.

Looking back, the biggest problem 15 years ago was that the administra­tion was stuck in an echo chamber and far too optimistic, and Democrats and the news media alike mostly rolled over. Journalist­s too often acted as lap dogs, not watchdogs — and today I fear that we may be so busy chasing the latest shiny object that we miss an abyss ahead.

I also frankly doubt that we as a nation have learned the lesson from Iraq. A recent Pew survey found that 43 percent of Americans still believe that invading Iraq was the correct decision.

Hello?

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States