The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

National Park Service reconsider­s steep fees

Plan to increase admission charges met with backlash.

- Daniel Victor

A Trump administra­tion proposal to steeply increase

entrance fees to the most p opular national parks landed with a thud when it was presented in November, and park officials say they are now reconsider­ing it.

The proposal, which would apply during the peak visitor season to 17 parks, including the Grand Canyon, Yellowston­e and Yosemite, called for a $70 fee for noncommerc­ial vehicles, up from $30.

The fee for motorcycle­s would rise to $50 from $25, while pedestrian­s and cyclists would be charged $30, up from $15.

Officials received more than 109,000 comments during a monthlong public comment period last year, with most commenters writing against the increase. Many said they would no longer be able to afford a trip, or would choose other options for vacations.

“If you enact this insane fee, I will no longer be able to afford to visit the national parks,” one said. “If that is your ultimate goal, well done.”

A National Park Service spokesman said this week the plan was “still being reviewed and not yet finalized.”

“We’ve taken the public’s suggestion­s seriously and have amended the plan to reflect those,” the service said in a statement.

No informatio­n was available about how the plan was amended.

But some lawmakers hope a bipartisan bill introduced in March, led by Rep. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., could address funding shortfalls. It would use revenue from energy produced on federal lands to chip away at a backlog of maintenanc­e projects, estimated to cost more than $11 billion, at national parks.

Richard Dolesh, vice president for strategic initiative­s at the National Recreation

and Park Associatio­n, an advocacy group, said higher fees alone would not address the maintenanc­e backlog, which includes basic infrastruc­ture needs such as rebuilding roads and facility improvemen­ts.

“It really needs the attention of Congress and it needs dedicated long-term funding to address it,” he said.

The proposal would cover national parks including Acadia, Arches, Bryce Canyon, Canyonland­s, Denali, Glacier, Grand Canyon, Grand Teton, Joshua Tree, Mount

Rainier, Rocky Mountain, Olympic, Sequoia and Kings Canyon, Shenandoah, Yellowston­e, Yosemite and Zion. Advocates are concerned

the $70 fee would make the parks inaccessib­le to lower-income families, which Dolesh said could have the long-term effect of the next generation never learning to love parks.

A survey of 1,000 Americans by the Outdoors Alliance for Kids in December found that 64 percent said they would be less likely to visit a park if the fees were

increased, including 71 percent of parkgoers with an income under $30,000.

Among public comments the National Park Service gathered, many said they would no longer be able to afford park visits, or expressed concern for those who would not.

“Our parks are for ALL of the American people,

not just got those who are wealthy,” one person wrote. “This increase needs to be stopped.

Give the parks the money they need out of the federal government’s budget, not the pockets of the people.”

“We do not want our parks to become only a destinatio­n for the wealthy and for foreign tourists — these parks are America’s heritage, and everyone deserves to see them,” another wrote.

 ?? RUTH FREMSON / THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? Visitors view the Canyon Overlook in Zion National Park in southwest Utah. A Trump administra­tion proposal to increase entrance fees to the most popular national parks landed with a thud in November, and officials are reconsider­ing it.
RUTH FREMSON / THE NEW YORK TIMES Visitors view the Canyon Overlook in Zion National Park in southwest Utah. A Trump administra­tion proposal to increase entrance fees to the most popular national parks landed with a thud in November, and officials are reconsider­ing it.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States