The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Report casts doubt on allegation­s of harassment against candidate

Attorney interviewe­d lawmakers, officials about lobbyist’s claims.

- By James Salzer jsalzer@ajc.com and Greg Bluestein gbluestein@ajc.com

The lawyer investigat­ing allegation­s that state Sen. David Shafer, a leading Republican candidate for lieutenant governor, sexually harassed a veteran lobbyist for years cast suspicion on the allegation.

In her report — obtained by The Atlanta Journal-Constituti­on — Penn Payne wrote, “My ultimate conclusion­s are that it is more likely that Sen. Shafer did not make sexually harassing comments and demands to (the lobbyist) than it is likely that he did, and that it is more likely that the (lobbyist) has fabricated her allegation­s of sexually harassing conduct than it is likely that she is telling the truth.”

Shafer, R-Duluth, had called for the Senate Ethics Commission to make the report public after senators met for four hours Thursday in closed-door, unpubliciz­ed meetings. Reporters were told that the committee would not make any announceme­nt Thursday on whether it would dismiss or move forward with the complaint — first reported by the AJC on March 9.

When the meetings ended, Senate Ethics Chairman Dean Burke, R-Bainbridge, said, “No comment until we are done with our work.” He didn’t say when that might be.

Later, Shafer tweeted, “We have not seen the report but have believed from the start it will exonerate us.”

Shafer, the top fundraiser in the lieutenant governor’s race and a former Senate leader, had called the complaint from a longtime lobbyist an attempt by a “a 15-minute, attention-seeking wannabe trying to settle an old score.”

The AJC does not name alleged victims of sexual assault or sexual harassment. The woman worked with Shafer at the Georgia Republican Party in the 1990s and later, as a lobbyist, sought his help to pass legislatio­n. She accused Shafer of retaliatin­g against her when she turned back his advances.

The 58-page report, marked “confidenti­al” and obtained by the AJC independen­tly, includes interviews with at least four lawmakers and about a halfdozen other officials.

It concluded there was no evidence that Shafer retaliated toward the lobbyist by killing her legislatio­n and found that no witness who was interviewe­d heard Shafer make “sexually inappropri­ate remarks” to the accuser.

The accuser’s “descriptio­n of Sen. Shafer as spitting venom, anger and resentment is at odds with the descriptio­ns of him from some of the other witnesses who are female lobbyists,” who described him as profession­al.

Still, several of the people interviewe­d also said they didn’t discount the lobbyist’s accusation­s. Among them was Senate Majority Leader Bill Cowsert, R-Athens, who told investigat­ors he believed the lobbyist’s complaint.

“I had never known her to be dishonest. I have never known her to be dramatic or, you know, exaggerate in any way,” he said, according to the report. He added that it had a “ring of truthfulne­ss to it.”

Payne wrote that the lobbyist made a series of “unfounded assumption­s” that hurt her credibilit­y. The most “glaring” was an assertion that Shafer was in favor of legislatio­n she was pushing in 2011 before she said she refused his advances. Payne said the evidence shows he opposed the measure long before the alleged harassment took place.

“The fact that she told people about the sexual harassment in 2011-2014 using the same detail that is now in her complaint still weighs in her favor,” Payne wrote. “But it is not sufficient to overcome my concerns about her credibilit­y and other factual conclusion­s that I have reached, which do not support the truth of her allegation­s and which support Sen. Shafer’s denials of the allegation­s.”

Sexual harassment cases have roiled statehouse­s across the country, but Georgia’s system is set up so complaints are handled behind closed doors.

The Georgia General Assembly exempted itself from the Georgia Open Records Act, so any filings are secret, although the AJC obtained a copy of the complaint.

The complaint alleged that harassment involving Shafer had been going on for years. After she turned down his advances, the lobbyist said, she was convinced Shafer would hurt her clients. He eventually stopped talking to her.

Shafer said the lobbyist has a history of making things up, and that he dated her in the 1990s, something she denied.

Shafer said he had a policy of not meeting alone with the lobbyist, and he produced affidavits from three people attesting to that policy. Two of the affidavits came from lobbyists who have contribute­d to Shafer’s campaign for lieutenant governor.

Senate leaders last month hired Payne, a frequent donor to Democratic Party candidates and causes, and a longtime mediator and arbitrator, to investigat­e the complaint.

Five days after the AJC reported the complaint, Burke contribute­d $2,500 to the lieutenant governor’s campaign of ex-state Sen. Rick Jeffares, one of two Republican­s running against Shafer in the May 22 primary.

Because of big increases in the number of major sexual harassment accusation­s against celebritie­s and politician­s last fall, Georgia lawmakers began reviewing their policies for dealing with those cases.

Sexual harassment complaints involving legislator­s and employees can be reported to the House Ethics Committee, the Senate Administra­tive Affairs Committee, the secretary of the Senate, the clerk of the House or the legislativ­e fiscal officer, according to the Georgia General Assembly’s sexual harassment policy.

Then complaints are forwarded to the Senate or House ethics committees for investigat­ion by either a subcommitt­ee or an outside third party.

Punishment­s for violations of the policy include counseling, terminatio­n or other discipline. Legislator­s could be expelled, fined or censured by a two-thirds vote of the House or Senate, according to the Georgia Constituti­on.

 ??  ?? State Sen. David Shafer
State Sen. David Shafer

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States