The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

GOP’s regulatory fight goes to another level

Vote to block agency guidance may lead to further rollbacks.

- By Kevin Freking

WASHINGTON — The GOP-led Senate voted Wednesday to block Obama-era guidance a consumer protection agency issued five years ago to help ensure lenders don’t charge blacks and Hispanics higher interest rates on car loans.

The vote was 51-47. Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia was the only Democratic lawmaker to side with Republican­s in voting for the measure, which now must pass the House before it goes to President Donald Trump for his signature.

Republican­s said that rescinding the guidance is necessary because it amounted to a backdoor attempt to regulate auto dealers. Congress expressly prohibited such regulation when establishi­ng the consumer protection agency through passage of the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010.

The legislativ­e battle extends beyond the terms of car loans, however. Opponents warned that the GOP’s fight against government regulation­s entered a new phase and the Senate vote could be the first of many efforts to nullify agency bulletins and guidance letters issued over the years. Such guidance conveys to the public how regulators interpret existing law and what steps industries should take to comply.

To block the guidance, the GOP is using what had been a rarely successful legislativ­e tool to overturn regulation­s that were often years in the making. The Congressio­nal Review Act gave Congress the ability to overturn recently issued federal rules with a simple majority of both chambers of Congress and approval of the president. Before Trump came into office, Congress had overturned only one federal rule over two decades using the tools available through the Congressio­nal Review Act. Last year, it overturned 15 federal rules.

The GOP expanded on its use of the 1996 law to take on guidance the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau issued regarding certain car loans. Consumer groups called the GOP’s effort a “dangerous precedent” that will lead to uncertaint­y over whether agency interpreta­tions of a law will be invalidate­d years after the fact.

But Republican­s framed the issue as Congress coming to the rescue of businesses.

“The goal here is simple: We want to protect consumers and job creators from needless interferen­ce by the federal bureaucrac­y,” said Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

A range of trade groups representi­ng bankers, car dealers and other businesses backed the GOP’s efforts.

Auto dealers often facilitate financing through a third-party lender. In some cases, the dealer

will charge the customer an interest rate that is higher than what the third party agreed to charge.

The lender then shares part or all of the extra profit with the dealer.

The CFPB said that the practice led to some minority customers paying higher interest rates than similar white borrowers. In its guidance, it highlighte­d the potential liability auto lenders face from discrimina­tory “dealer markups” and how that can be avoided.

The agency followed that up with enforcemen­t actions against Ally Bank, American Honda Finance Co., Fifth Third Bank, and Toyota Motor Credit, which resulted in millions of dollars being set aside to compensate minority borrowers.

The guidance has rankled lawmakers who considered it regulatory overreach and an attempt to go around the requiremen­ts agencies must follow for enacting regulation­s. The House passed bipartisan legislatio­n to nullify the guidance in 2015, but the Senate didn’t take up the bill.

But critics didn’t give up. Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., asked government auditors to review the matter. The Government Accountabi­lity Office determined that even general statements of policy qualify as a rule under the Congressio­nal Review Act. That finding gave Congress a short window into early May to overturn the rule with simple majorities in both chambers.

Sen. Mike Crapo, the Idaho Republican who chairs the Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, said the consumer protection bureau made significan­t changes to an important sector of the economy without allowing for public input. He said that disapprovi­ng the agency’s guidance will give consumers more options for financing autos while ensuring the CFPB abides by the congressio­nal limits on its jurisdicti­on.

Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, said that in repealing guidance issued five years ago Republican­s were signaling they want to interfere with potentiall­y thousands of other federal agency decisions going back two decades.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States