The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Draft, self-analysis should get Falcons back on top

- Jeff Schultz Schultz continued on C8

The first FLOWERY BRANCH — clue Pat Dye Jr. had that the Falcons were genuinely interested in drafting Calvin Ridley came the afternoon of Thursday’s first round when his phone rang and he looked down and saw it was Thomas Dimitroff.

“He said something like, ‘This may seem crazy, but: Calvin Ridley,’” Dye, Ridley’s agent, said. “I said, ‘Thomas, you’re not going to see him where you’re picking.’ He said, ‘I’m contemplat­ing moving up. Where do you think we’d have to get to?’”

Dye proceeded to tell Dimitroff potential landing targets for the wide receiver from Alabama: Baltimore at 16. Dallas at 19. Carolina at 24. Dimitroff pondered trading up eight to 10 picks but determined it likely would’ve cost a sec

ond-round pick — too expensive. So he opted to sit back and wait. It worked. Dye said he was “stunned” when Carolina took wide receiver D.J. Moore over Ridley. When the Falcons’ turn came up at 26, they were staring at two players who had been given almost identical grades by the Fal

cons’ scouting staff: Ridley and Florida defensive tackle Taven Bryan.

Defensive tackle was the Falcons’ biggest need. Wide receiver second. But they went with Ridley because they viewed the drop-off in available wide receivers significan­t after him, while the cluster of the best defensive tackles was closely bunched on the team’s draft board.

“In our minds, we were looking at two very talented and legit contributo­rs coming in as young guys on the team,” Dimitroff said.

This week’s draft was part of an important offseason for a number of reasons. The Falcons not only needed to fill

holes on the roster, but to determine why they struggled at times on offense, had bouts of inconsiste­ncy and inexplicab­ly lost consecutiv­e home games to Buffalo and Miami, which would cost them down the line.

It was not a horrible season, even with it ending with a deflating 15-10 playoff loss at Philadelph­ia following the season’s last of too many redzone failures. The Falcons were the only NFC team to make it back to the playoffs after the 2016 season. They won a road playoff game in Los Angeles, smothering the league’s No. 1 offense. Good, good.

But after the Super Bowl run the year before, the season was widely viewed as a letdown.

“I don’t see last year as a failure,” coach Dan Quinn said. “A lot went right. What didn’t go right was us not closing at the end of the divisional game against Philly. What I did like was a lot of improvemen­t defensivel­y. By no means was I satisfied, but I also don’t think the team was a failure in any stretch. I thought we showed a lot of resiliency, a lot of toughness. But did we get what we wanted to get done? No.”

Quinn and Dimitroff understood where the roster needed to improve. They needed a veteran guard but didn’t have much salary-cap room (Brandon Fusco was signed in free agency). They needed a defensive tackle, preferably a space eater (third-round pick Deadrin Senat from South Florida is like a cinder block with legs at 315 pounds). They needed a third receiver to go with Julio Jones and Mohamed Sanu who could stretch the field and get open in man coverage like Taylor Gabriel did in 2016 (Ridley’s speed and route-running make him a definite upgrade). They also added another defensive back with speed and length (Colorado’s Isaiah Oliver).

They also needed a little bit of self-analysis.

Quinn said the coaching staff and returning players have been more proactive this offseason than following 2016 in terms of studying tape and understand­ing how to fix problems.

“We dug into our pointof-attack tapes,” he said.

“Near the end of ’16 season we hit our stride and played our best in November, December, January. This (2017) team was more up and down.”

He also referenced the losses to Miami and Buffalo, which prevented the Falcons from hosting a playoff game, the potential ripple effect being obvious. “Those are the lessons that you learn,” he said.

This also has been a more serene offseason than the year before. The Super Bowl loss to New England the year before led to every local and national media outlet asking “hangover” questions and picking through the ruins.

The team won’t have to deal with that nearly as often moving forward.

“It’s emotionall­y lighter,” Quinn said. “Members of the media and others were talking about the difficult ending to ’16, which was emotionall­y hard. How could it not be? But I would also say this offseason has been different than last offseason. I saw this group work out for the first time this week (in the voluntary offseason workout program). I was extremely impressed.”

Dimitroff echoed: “I really believe there’s been so much learned by the coaching staff and the players since the Super Bowl and what we went through last year. We’re still maturing.”

They look better today than when the season ended. Come September, we’ll start to find out if the view has really changed.

Listen to the “We Never Played the Game” podcast. Check out the podcast show page at AJC.com/sportswe-never-played-the-game. Subscribe on iTunes, Google Play, Stitcher or TuneIn, or listen from the AJC sports podcasts page or the WSB Radio on-demand page.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States