The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Why tariffs could loom large in Ga. elections

Democrats pounce on issue that has divided state’s Republican­s.

- By Greg Bluestein gbluestein@ajc.com and Tamar Hallerman tamar.hallerman@ajc.com

President Donald CHATSWORTH — Trump’s threats of an escalating trade battle with China, Canada and other U.S. allies has added a wild card element to Georgia’s midterm campaigns, as Democrats pounce on the new tariffs to pummel Republican­s who are tied to the White House’s agenda.

Democrat Stacey Abrams has seized on the issue as part of a broader attempt to steer the focus of the election for governor toward her economic platform, salting her stops in rural manufactur­ing hubs with fresh warnings about Trump’s trade policies.

And some down-ticket candidates have indicated they plan to join the chorus of criticism, hoping it helps give them a new line of attack against GOP incumbents who are defending the plan — or diplomatic­ally trying to keep

their distance.

Some Republican­s, wary of putting any daylight between themselves and Trump, have largely stood by the president. Brian Kemp, the GOP nominee for governor, said he supports whatever decision the president makes on delicate trade negotiatio­ns.

Others such as U.S. Reps. Karen Handel and Drew Ferguson have urged the administra­tion to change course on specific tariffs without criticizin­g the president directly. And U.S. Sen. Johnny Isakson has taken some of the most aggressive steps against the new duties, signing on to two bipartisan bills that would block them.

“It’s just not a good way to do business,” the Republican said Wednesday. “I think it hurts expansion, it hurts new investment and it just impacts the business climate negatively for those things that have a lot of steel and aluminum components, which is most everything.”

It’s a fluid situation, with Trump warning Wednesday that he could boost a proposed tariff rate from 10 percent to 25 percent on $200 billion worth of Chinese goods. China responded Friday with its own threat of tariffs targeting $60 billion in U.S. goods.

Some Georgia businesses say they’re already feeling pinched by Trump’s earlier tariff moves, which include a 25 percent duty on imported steel and 10 percent tax on aluminum. They prompted retaliator­y tariffs from abroad on a bevy of American goods. Others have reported little direct impact so far.

The tariffs have led to major heartburn in Georgia’s booming but metal-reliant auto and beverage sectors, with blue chip companies such as Coca-Cola announcing price increases on their products.

The retaliator­y tariffs on U.S. agricultur­al exports have also created significan­t uncertaint­y among farmers, even after the Trump administra­tion announced a new $12 billion federal subsidy program designed to provide short-term relief.

As some countries fight back with targeted tariffs on items such as peanut butter, bourbon and Harley-Davidson motorcycle­s, candidates are bracing for the impact. It could take months for many consumers to feel the full fallout of the tariffs, and Democrats are betting that when they do they’ll want to exact revenge at the ballot box this fall.

‘Wrongheade­d’

That’s one reason why Abrams highlighte­d the tariffs at a campaign stop this week in Murray County, a deep-red bastion of 40,000 people that struggles with a declining population and a sputtering local economy. About 1 in 5 residents here lives below the poverty line.

It’s also the home to a sprawling new inland port that’s soon to be completed. When it’s done, it’s set to bring dozens of jobs, keep thousands of tractor-trailers away from Atlanta highways and serve, it’s hoped, as a magnet for more manufactur­ing plants.

Abrams, flanked by local Democrats, warned that the tit-for-tat tariffs could threaten that promise. She called them a “terrible idea that is harming our investment in this inland port in Chatsworth,” along with the bustling port across the state in Savannah.

“It’s unfortunat­e and very wrongheade­d that our own government is creating a problem for business to operate in the United States,” she said. “And I would absolutely stand against any leader who would say that it’s a good thing to cripple Georgia jobs by imposing tariffs and starting a trade war.”

Kemp earned Trump’s endorsemen­t in July in part by emphasizin­g his loyalty to the president, and he stuck to that tack when asked about the potential fallout of a trade war.

The secretary of state called Trump a “successful deal maker” who has surrounded himself with shrewd negotiator­s, including Agricultur­e Secretary Sonny Perdue, a former Georgia governor whose department designed the new aid program for farmers. He’s confident, he added, that Trump and his team “will broker smart deals that spur economic growth.”

State leaders have little say over internatio­nal trade issues, and Gov. Nathan Deal has largely avoided the topic, aside from saying the U.S. generally has lower tariffs than most other nations. Abrams, however, said a different approach could send a message to the White House.

“There’s very little we can do other than to call attention to those decisions,” Abrams said. “My issue is that the silence of Georgia leaders — or at worst, the complicity — says that we think this is a good idea. And part of being a good leader is standing up to those on your side of the aisle.”

‘More equitable trade’

In battlegrou­nd Senate contests in North Dakota and Tennessee, Democrats have cast the tariffs as a drag on jobs and local economies. And leaders of conservati­ve groups, such as the Koch brothers’ vast political network, have warned of an economic backlash that could harm business interests.

Republican­s have countered with a range of messages. Some have backed the president. A few free-trade Republican­s have sought to sidestep the debate entirely. A bigger group has aimed to create some distance between itself and the president’s trade strategy while also voicing support for his underlying goal: getting trade partners such as China to the negotiatin­g table.

“I support President Trump’s goal to renegotiat­e agreements with our trading partners and champion the ‘America first’ strategy, so that our farmers, businesses and workers have a level playing field,” Handel said shortly after the steel and aluminum tariffs were imposed in May.

But the Roswell Republican added that the tariffs and the “inevitable” retaliator­y actions they would prompt from abroad “will hurt working Americans, negatively affect our economy and do not further the goal of fostering more equitable trade.”

The issue has yet to become a major point of contention in Handel’s re-election battle or other suburban Atlanta congressio­nal races. But challenger­s have vowed to pounce in the lead-up to the November general election, especially if consumers begin feeling more pain as a result of Trump’s actions.

Handel’s opponent, Democrat Lucy McBath, has largely focused her campaign on health care and gun control, but on the trail she’s promised to “bring stability to our foreign policy and support internatio­nal trade that is free, fair to American workers, and protects environmen­tal and labor standards.”

Some down-ticket candidates see the tariffs as an opening, too. Sarah Riggs Amico, the Democratic nominee for lieutenant governor, called the new duties “indefensib­le” — and pointed out several Georgia conservati­ves who also opposed them.

Her November opponent, Republican Geoff Duncan, said he agrees with Trump that all tariffs should eventually be eliminated, but he criticized Democrats for supporting a “status quo which is very unfair to Georgia’s workers and farmers.”

In Chatsworth, Democrats are optimistic their trade message will resonate. Elizabeth Gould, a local Democratic activist, said the tariffs will surely backfire on Republican­s once “voters here feel it.” Others have picked up on the same message.

“I’m hearing from folks that the tariffs are dangerous, and even Republican­s are worried they harm us,” said Michael Morgan, a Democratic candidate for the state Senate in northwest Georgia. “If something harms the state, it’s the duty of our leaders to say so.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States