The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

‘Quackery’ a cure-all for those seeking good reading

- By Jill Vejnoska jvejnoska@ajc.com

Smoking has an awfully lousy image these days, from its health implicatio­ns to the way it stinks up people’s cars.

Still, there were even worse aspects to smoking not so long ago, according to a recently published book.

“Literally blowing smoke up someone’s (fanny) was a sanctioned resuscitat­ion method in the eighteenth century,” Dr. Lydia Kang and Nate Pedersen write in “Quackery: A Brief History of the Worst Ways to Cure Everything.” What’s more, “If your victim had cholera, for example, then you’d be a goner too, by virtue of sucking down cholera bacteria.”

Yuck, most readers likely will find themselves thinking. And … Please, tell us more! Kang, a practicing internal medicine physician in Omaha, will discuss “Quackery” at 11:15 a.m. Saturday at Marriott Conference Center B as part of the AJC Decatur Book Festival. The book, an arsenic-to-radon — with stops along the way at things like leeches and, shudder, “corpse medicine” — overview of treatments throughout time definitely lives up to its title.

Or is that down? “Quackery” presents a rogues gallery of characters who likely knew — or should have known — that their so-called cures were full of hot air. Literally, in one case: The founder of the “Breatharia­n Institute of America” was a “charismati­c charlatan,” who “claimed to eat only when there was no fresh air to breathe, or when he couldn’t get enough sunshine.” (Spoiler alert: Someone caught him coming out of a 7-Eleven clutching “a Twinkie, a Slurpee and a hot dog.”)

Yet deep within some past quackeries lie the seeds of some modern-day medicine. Bad idea: Encouragin­g people in the early 20th century to ingest radium in drinking water and toothpaste. Better idea: Radiation now is a primary treatment for cancer.

“Behind every misguided treatment … is the incredible power of the human desire to live,” the authors write. “None of today’s medical achievemen­ts would have occurred without challengin­g the status quo.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Kang
Kang

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States