The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Fulton, Atlanta likely to lose worker grants

Officials have left nearly $750K in federal money on the table since 2015.

- By Arielle Kass akass@ajc.com

Fulton County will lose $211,000 in federal grant money that was meant to provide job training for residents because it didn’t adhere to a deadline for spending the funds.

The failure to fully utilize workforce developmen­t grants has been an intractabl­e problem in the county. Since 2015, officials have left $746,574 on the table that had been awarded for job training.

The federal government allocates the workforce developmen­t money to states, which then disburse it to counties in overlappin­g two-year grants. The counties must obligate the money by the end of June of the first year and must spend it by June 30 of the second year, or return the bulk of the funds.

The city of Atlanta appears to have failed to spend all of the money available in its workforce developmen­t program, as well, though the amount of workforce developmen­t money that wasn’t spent is unclear.

Samir Abdullahi, the deputy director of economic developmen­t for Select Fulton, the county’s economic developmen­t arm, said the county provided job training for no more than 50 people this year. That number could have been as many as 300, he said, but the grant was poorly managed by the county and people were not connected with training opportunit­ies in a timely manner.

“As with everyone, I’m obviously disappoint­ed,” he said. “It’s low. It’s dramatical­ly low.”

But, he said, Fulton is in a better position to spend the money going forward. Even though this is the fourth year in a row that the county is returning more than $100,000 to the federal government, he said his department has asked the state for more grant money to expand the programs offered to job-seekers. In previous years, when money was returned, a different Fulton County department had oversight of the grant.

The unused grant money is redistribu­ted each year to workforce agencies the state government thinks will do a better job of spending the funds.

The county is replacing about half the members of its workforce developmen­t board, Abdullahi said, in order to find people who are more engaged. It’s also hired ResCare Workforce Services, a Kentucky company, to be more hands-on with the grant money, and provide services from job training to career planning.

Both Fulton County and Atlanta are returning money despite last-minute scrambling to obligate funds so they would not be reclaimed. Fulton signed a $2 million contract with ResCare; Atlanta obligated $2 million to Atlanta Technical College.

A preliminar­y report Atlanta sent to the state indicates the city had nearly $320,000 in unobligate­d funds in the 2017 fiscal year and more than $433,000 in unobligate­d funds in the 2018 fiscal year.

Michael Smith, a spokespers­on for the city, said WorkSource Atlanta “has yet to receive final notice about the possibilit­y of having funds recaptured.”

At a WorkSource Atlanta board retreat Friday, Kimberlyn Daniel, the Interim Executive Director of WorkSource Atlanta, who was appointed in July, refused to answer reporters’ questions about her plans to improve the agency’s results. She told board members WorkSource Atlanta “has been through many growing challenges” and has the opportunit­y to show “a much better rate of success.”

“I’m committed to helping get the organizati­on back on track,” she told the board. “I’ll be the one with the ultimate responsibi­lity.”

Matt Westmorela­nd, a member of the Atlanta city council, said WorkSource Atlanta has “just been a mess” in recent years. There was no quarterly report about the agency’s work in March or June, he said, and earlier this month, leaders could not explain why money was unspent, or talk about their budget plans for the coming year.

Westmorela­nd said workforce developmen­t should be a core function of the city. He was disappoint­ed that available money wasn’t being used.

“I’m really frustrated,” he said. “That’s not how it’s supposed to work. This is not ideal, operating-on-all-cylinders behavior.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States