The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Social issues still key for some voters

Abrams, Kemp tack to center, put hot-button themes in background.

- By Greg Bluestein gbluestein@ajc.com

The swirl of social issues that dominated the debate early this year may as well seem an afterthoug­ht now—a nd that’s exactly the way the candidates like it.

Republican Brian Kemp is more likely to talk ab out hi sl aw-and-order policies and his teacher pay raise plan than divisions over guns, abortion and “religious lib- erty”—orhised gy ads featuring shotguns and chain saws that he used to help distinguis­h himself from other GOP candidates.

And Democrat Stacey Abrams has upped her focus on the same themes she’s embraced since entering the race: expanding Medicaid and boosting school funding. She’s likely to only wade into debates over, say, abortion rights, if specifical­ly asked about them by voters.

But that doesn’t mean those fights have disappeare­d. Although a recent Atlanta Journal-Constituti­on poll shows voters are most

concerned about education and health care, there’s a deep undercurre­nt of concern about social issues.

At a Newnan barbecue, Kemp supporter Loreli Scott was blunt: “I believe in the Constituti­on, and it’s critical we have someone who supports its conservati­ve values.”

And Ashley Grizzle Soeder, an Abrams backer from Senoia, was just as sharp: “I am very concerned that Kemp is part of Trump’s hatefilled agenda. I’m worried about all — every one — of the social issues.”

Those types of fights have a knack for dominating conversati­on in Georgia and sucking up the oxygen around fights over other pressing issues, such as budget policy and infrastruc­ture improvemen­ts.

Just ask Gov. Nathan Deal, who bucked his own party’s base by vetoing a religious liberty proposal and nixing a gun rights expansion — leading some enraged activists to call for his resignatio­n.

Flashy fights

That religious liberty veto in 2016 will go down as one of Deal’s signature decisions, but it did little to quell the clamor among other Republican­s for the legislatio­n, which supporters see as a noncontrov­ersial way to provide more legal protection to the faithbased.

It’s one reason why Kemp and most other Republican candidates for governor quickly signed a pledge to support the legislatio­n if elected, even as Democratic critics assailed the measure as thinly veiled discrimina­tion and point to threats of boycotts from major corporatio­ns if such a measure becomes law.

Since securing his party’s nomination, though, Kemp has tried to add some nuance to his stance. He’s said he would veto any measure that veers from the federal version, known as the Religious Freedom and Restoratio­n Act, that became law in 1993 on a bipartisan vote and bears Bill Clinton’s signature.

“It’s time to do that, put that behind us so we can move on,” he said, adding: “That’s all I’m committing to do. Anything else, I’ll veto it.”

Abrams has sharpened her already razor-edged opposition to such legislatio­n, telling crowds at business functions that no religious liberty bill “will ever become law in the state of Georgia” because it’s both “divisive and discrimina­tory.”

And she recently unveiled endorsemen­ts from business owners who warned of a devastatin­g economic backlash if Kemp made good on his promise.

“This is not an idle threat,” said Andrew Feiler, an artist and film industry entreprene­ur. “We’ve spent two decades building the film industry, and RFRA would have directly affected our business.”

The divide is just as stark over guns, where Abrams has broken from decades of convention­al Democratic strategy in Georgia by calling for new firearms restrictio­ns. She often says such limits are now in the mainstream, pointing to polls that show broader support for new regulation­s.

Her proposals include support for universal background checks for private sales of firearms, a ban of high-powered assault rifles and a repeal of legislatio­n that allows permit holders to carry weapons on college campuses.

‘Bring it’

Kemp, meanwhile, parlayed his vocal support for an expansion of gun rights to emerge from a crowded GOP field.

His ad showing him pointing a gun toward his daughter’s young suitor attracted national attention, and it helped him win endorsemen­ts from GeorgiaCar­ry. org and, later, the National Rifle Associatio­n.

He supports “constituti­onal carry,” which would let gun owners conceal and carry handguns without a permit, and he proposed a sales tax holiday for guns and ammunition. Kemp also wants to end some “gun-free” zones and praised the state’s rebuke to Delta Air Lines after it ended a discount for NRA members.

There’s an equally gaping divide over abortion rights, sparked by Kemp’s vow to “sign the toughest abortion laws in the country” if he’s elected. He adopted that position hours after Mississipp­i enacted a law that bans most abortions after 15 weeks.

“If abortion rights activists want to sue me ... bring it!” he wrote in March. “I’ll fight for life at the Capitol and in the courtroom.”

As for Abrams, she brandishes support from Planned Parenthood, a move she said would ensure that the “issue of reproducti­ve choice and reproducti­ve health will not be an offshoot conversati­on” in the governor’s race.

“It will not be a quiet whisper,” Abrams said of her opposition to abortion restrictio­ns. “It will be a proud and central facet of this campaign.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States