The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

U.S. seeks more opt-outs for birth control coverage

- By Samantha Schmidt

WASHINGTON — The Trump administra­tion is expected to soon issue regulation­s that would expand religious and moral exemptions for covering birth control in employer health insurance plans, a move that critics say would limit women’s access to contracept­ion.

The rules would likely roll back a controvers­ial Obamaera mandate in the Affordable Care Act that required employers to cover birth control. The regulation­s were filed last week for review with the Office of Management and Budget, indicating that the administra­tion is in the final stages of issuing the expanded exemptions.

The exact details of the exemptions, and when they would take effect, remain unclear. But women’s health advocates are bracing for a legal fight. They expect the rules to mimic earlier regulation­s enacted by the Trump administra­tion last year before being blocked by federal judges.

The rules allowed nearly any employer — nonprofit or for-profit — with a religious or moral objection to opt out of the Affordable Care Act provision requiring the coverage of contracept­ion at no cost for the employee. The rules vastly expanded which companies could be exempt from the mandate and why, including a broad exemption for a “sincerely held moral conviction” not based in any particular religious belief. Perhaps most significan­tly, it required employers to provide no other accommodat­ions for employees seeking birth control coverage.

The Trump administra­tion rules were “nothing short of radical,” American Civil Liberties Union Deputy Legal Director Louise Melling said in a phone call Thursday with reporters. “There’s no backstop to ensure coverage for employees.”

Before Trump took office, the Obama administra­tion was facing scores of lawsuits from organizati­ons, such as Hobby Lobby, arguing that the free-contracept­ion mandate violated their religious beliefs. The mandate required employers to cover the full range of contracept­ive services approved by the Food and Drug Administra­tion, including emergency contracept­ion and IUDs, without cost-sharing.

After a Supreme Court decision in the Hobby Lobby case, the Obama administra­tion allowed religiousl­y-affiliated nonprofits and certain private, for-profit corporatio­ns to opt out of the coverage, as long as their employees were provided with an accommodat­ion.

Then, in October 2017, the Trump administra­tion issued its directive significan­tly expanding those exemptions.

Several states and advocacy groups quickly sued, arguing in part that the Department of Health and Human Services enacted its rules without the notice and comment period required by federal law.

In December 2017, federal judges in California and Pennsylvan­ia issued preliminar­y injunction­s blocking the rules from taking effect. The Trump administra­tion appealed both injunction­s and the cases are ongoing; a hearing in the California case is scheduled today.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States