The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Tip for Trump: Your tariffs hurt Americans the most

- Robert Reich

“I am a Tariff Man,” President Donald Trump tweeted last week. “When people or countries come in to raid the great wealth of our Nation, I want them to pay for the privilege of doing so . ... We are right now taking in $billions in Tariffs. MAKE AMERICA RICH AGAIN.”

I’m sorry, Mr. President, but you got this wrong. Tariffs are paid by American consumers. About half the $200 billion worth of Chinese goods you’ve already put tariffs on come almost exclusivel­y from China, which means American consumers are taking a hit.

These tariffs function exactly like taxes. By imposing them, you have in effect raised taxes on most Americans. You have made Americans poorer.

Worse yet, they’re regressive. The middle class and poor pay a larger percentage of their incomes on these tariffs than do the rich.

Your tariffs could put us into a recession. The world’s other big economies are slowing, too. In 1930, Congressme­n Smoot and Hawley championed isolationi­st tariffs that Herbert Hoover signed into law. They deepened the Great Depression.

Your economic advisers are trying to put the best possible face on all this, arguing that your tariffs are designed to improve your bargaining leverage with China.

Some of your advisers say your real aim isn’t about trade at all. It’s to get China to stop stealing American technology. This presumably was the reason behind last week’s arrest of the chief financial officer of Chinese tech giant Huawei Technologi­es. (Hint: That arrest won’t make it any easier to reach an agreement with China.)

I’m not sure why you’re so interested in helping American corporatio­ns protect their technology, anyway. That technology doesn’t belong to the United States. It belongs to those corporatio­ns and their shareholde­rs. They develop and share it all over the world.

Most of these corporatio­ns have been willing to share their technology with China in joint ventures with Chinese companies, because that’s the price of entering the lucrative Chinese market. They still come away making lots of money.

Of course, they could make even more if the Chinese didn’t take the technology. So maybe, as with the tax cut, you just want to make big corporatio­ns richer.

But I’m going to assume your real concern is America’s national security, and that this whole “Tariff Man” blunderbus­s is designed to prevent China from racing ahead of us in technologi­es critical to national defense. John Bolton, your national security adviser, has said the real issue is “a question of power,” and the theft of intellectu­al property has “a major impact on China’s economic capacity and therefore on its military capacity.” Bolton advises you, right?

But if this is your real motive might I suggest a better way to protect national security? You have the authority to stop foreign corporatio­ns from buying any American corporatio­n whose technology is critical to national security. So why not prohibit American corporatio­ns that possess such technology from sharing it with China?

Sure, these American corporatio­ns would have to sacrifice some profits, but so what? Your job isn’t to make them more profitable. It’s to protect the United States.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States