The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

U.S., China talk trade as economic growth cools

Slowdown has been boosting pressure to reach settlement.

- By Joe McDonald

BEIJING — Facing a March deadline, talks aimed at ending a trade war between China and the U.S. are underway, with the world’s two biggest economies expressing optimism over the potential for progress but neither indicating its stance has changed.

Cooling economic growth in both countries is increasing pressure to reach a settlement.

As the talks began Monday at the Chinese Commerce Ministry, Beijing complained about a U.S. warship in what it said were Chinese waters, but it was unclear if that would disrupt the proceeding­s. Both sides have provided scant informatio­n about their discussion­s.

The talks went ahead despite tensions over the arrest of a Chinese tech executive in Canada on U.S. charges related to possible violations of trade sanctions against Iran. The American delegation is led by a deputy U.S. trade representa­tive, Jeffrey D. Gerrish, and includes agricultur­e, energy, commerce, treasury and State Department officials.

President Donald Trump imposed tariff increases of up to 25 percent on $250 billion of Chinese imports over complaints Beijing steals or pressures companies to hand over technology. President Xi Jinping responded by imposing penalties on $110 billion of American goods, slowing customs clearance for U.S. companies and suspending issuing licenses in finance and other businesses.

A Dec. 1 agreement postponed further tariff increases. Economists say the 90-day postponeme­nt of additional tariff increases that had been meant to take effect Jan. 1 may be too short to settle the disputes bedeviling U.S.-Chinese relations.

Chinese growth fell to a post-global crisis low of 6.5 percent in the quarter ending in September. Auto sales tumbled 16 percent in November over a year earlier. Weak real estate sales are forcing developers to cut prices.

The U.S. economy grew at an annual rate of 3.4 percent in the third quarter, and unemployme­nt is at a five-decade low. But surveys show consumer confidence is weakening because of concern that growth will slow this year.

Washington, Europe and other trading partners complain Beijing’s tactics violate its market-opening obligation­s.

The standoff also reflects American anxiety about China’s rise as a potential competitor in telecommun­ications and other technology. Trump wants Beijing to roll back initiative­s intended to create homegrown Chinese leaders in robotics and artificial intelligen­ce.

China’s leaders see such strategies as a path to greater prosperity and global influence and have tried to defuse complaints by emphasizin­g the country’s potential as a huge consumer market.

They’ve also promised to allow more foreign access to its auto, finance and other industries.

Beijing has tried in vain to recruit France, Germany, South Korea and other government­s as allies against Trump, but they have echoed U.S. complaints about Chinese industrial policy and market barriers.

The European Union filed its own challenge in the World Trade Organizati­on in June against Chinese rules that the 28-nation trade bloc said hamper the ability of foreign companies to protect and profit from their own technology.

For their part, Chinese officials are unhappy with U.S. curbs on exports of “dual use” technology with possible military applicatio­ns. They complain China’s companies are treated unfairly in national security reviews of proposed corporate acquisitio­ns, though almost all deals are approved unchanged.

With talks expected to move into a second day today, it’s not clear whether the flap over the warship might throw them off track.

Ministry spokesman Lu Kang said Monday that Chinese military aircraft and naval vessels were dispatched to identify the U.S. vessel and warn it to leave the area near disputed islands in the South China Sea.

“We have made stern complaints with the U.S.,” Lu said.

A Pentagon spokesman, Lt. Col. David Eastburn, said “The United States will continue to fly, sail, and operate anywhere internatio­nal law allows.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States