The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Gillette’s ad is not wrong; here’s why

- Mona Charen She writes for Creators Syndicate.

Is the new Gillette razor ad a radical feminist attack on masculinit­y — the commercial embodiment of a woke sensibilit­y? I was prepared to think so. But having watched it twice, I find a lot to like. The ad has been panned by some conservati­ve commentato­rs. With all due respect, I think they are falling into a trap. They seem to have accepted the feminist framing. Women are benign and men are malign. For society to progress, men must change. We must extirpate “toxic masculinit­y.”

Understand­ably, this rubs conservati­ves the wrong way. I’ve risen to the defense of masculinit­y many times myself. But is the Gillette ad part of “a war on masculinit­y in America,” as Todd Starnes argued on Fox News?

Let’s figure out what the fight is about before taking sides.

There were a couple of undercurre­nts in the Gillette ad that suggested feminist influence — the term “toxic masculinit­y” should itself be toxic — but overall, the ad is pretty tame, even valuable. I have no idea if it’s the best way to sell razors, but as social commentary, it’s not offensive. “The Best Men Can Be” begins by showing men looking the other way as boys fight, shrugging “boys will be boys.” It shows men laughing at a comedy portraying a lout pantomimin­g a lunge at a woman’s behind. These are followed by more uplifting images of men breaking up fights, interferin­g with men who are harassing women and being loving fathers to daughters. These images didn’t strike me as a reproof of masculinit­y per se, but rather as a critique of bullying, boorishnes­s and sexual misconduct.

By reflexivel­y rushing to defend men in this context, some conservati­ves have run smack into an irony. Imaging themselves to be men’s champions, they are actually defending behavior, like sexual harassment and bullying, that a generation or two ago conservati­ves were the ones condemning. Sexual license, crude language and retreat from personal responsibi­lity were the hallmarks of the left. Liberals were the crowd saying: “Let it all hang out.” And “If it feels good, do it.” And “Chaste makes waste.” Feminists were the ones eyeing daggers at men who held chairs or doors for them, and insisting that a “woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.”

The left won that cultural battle. Standards of conduct for both sexes went out the window. Whereas men had once been raised to behave themselves in front of women, they were instead invited to believe that women deserved no special considerat­ion at all.

As I’ve written many times, the #MeToo movement is actually a protest against the libertine culture the sexual revolution ushered in. Some men are behaving really badly — harassing women, bullying each other and failing in their family responsibi­lities. Some women are, too, though the #MeToo movement doesn’t acknowledg­e that. But these behaviors are not “traditiona­l.” They’ve always existed, of course, but they went mainstream with the countercul­ture, which is now the culture. Conservati­ves should applaud that aspect of the Gillette message. Progressiv­es, in turn, should grapple with the overwhelmi­ng evidence that the best way to raise honorable men is with two parents. We may wish it were otherwise, but fathers — as disciplina­rians, role models and loving husbands — are key to rearing happy, healthy and responsibl­e sons, as well as self-confident, happy and high-achieving daughters.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States