The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Dems pick Milwaukee to help in Midwest

- Gail Collins She writes for the New York Times.

So the Democrats are going to nominate their presidenti­al candidate in ... Milwaukee! Let’s talk about this for a minute. It may not be the biggest news of the week, but it’s a lot more fun than analyzing Donald Trump’s budget plan.

Wisconsin, of course, is the state Hillary Clinton took for granted/failed to visit/lost in 2016. This is definitely a makeup bid. While nobody believes, deep down, that people base their vote on convention location, it can’t hurt.

“Where you hold our convention is a very strong statement of your values and who and what we are fighting for,” DNC chairman Tom Perez said in making the announceme­nt.

The Democrats have begun to realize the Midwest is a problem. Clinton won the popular vote by about 2.9 million, but she lost the electoral vote due to tiny, tiny margins in Michigan, Pennsylvan­ia and Wisconsin. And the Democrats have not held their presidenti­al convention in the Midwest for more than 100 years. Except for Chicago. Which is sadly known to some members of the party as “The Place Between New York and Los Angeles.”

Ah yes, St. Louis in 1916. Woodrow Wilson didn’t bother to show up, but a good time was had by all.

As soon as the site selection was announced, sniping started from the right. “No city in America has stronger ties to socialism than Milwaukee,” said the director of the Wisconsin Republican Party, veering off into a mention of Bernie Sanders.

Milwaukee did once have a few mayors who called themselves socialists, although the last left office in 1960, and their goal was not so much taking over the means of production as tossing out crooked politician­s. Which of course has no relation whatsoever to anything going on today.

Now, the city has strong union ties and a kind of working-class aura. The DNC passed up the glitzier options of Miami, which is sometimes known as “The Magic City,” and Houston, which once called itself “The Golden Buckle of the Sunbelt” and is now supposed to be nicknamed “The City With No Limits,” which perhaps refers to the lack of zoning laws.

Milwaukee doesn’t have a slogan. In 1995, some promoters came up with “Genuine American,” but nobody really liked it. (“I didn’t think it was possible to come up with anything worse than ‘A Great Place by a Great Lake.’ ... I think they’ve done it,” a county supervisor moaned.)

I used to live in Milwaukee, long ago, and I can attest it’s a fine city full of lovely people.

By the way, Wisconsin’s official motto is “Forward,” which is certainly hard to argue with. Although given the Democrats’ sensitivit­y to the events of 2016, it might very well change that to “Ignore Us at Your Peril.” The state hasn’t really been pressing the slogan thing since it tried to drop “America’s Dairyland” in 1985. The contest for a replacemen­t stumbled when the screening committee rejected the people’s choice of “Eat Cheese or Die.”

But about Milwaukee. The city likes to push its connection to the brewing industry — Perez celebrated the announceme­nt with a toast of beer. Maybe this will inspire the presidenti­al candidates to appropriat­e some of the old, spirits-related slogans for their campaigns.

For instance, which wine or beer tagline would you prefer for Joe Biden?

A) “Perfect for When Friends Drop In”

B) “Good Things Take Time” C) “You Only Go Around Once”

OK, definitely not “You Only Go Around Once.” But still, I think we’re onto something.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States