The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Ga.’s new voting machines will be up to the task

- By David Becker David Becker is executive director of the Center for Election Innovation and Research in Washington, D.C. He has been an attorney with the U.S. Justice Department, where he oversaw voting law enforcemen­t in several states, including Georgi

The threat of foreign interferen­ce in our elections is very real and is not going away. In response, it’s more important than ever that states improve cybersecur­ity around election technology and ensure processes that will protect our votes. The good news is around the country, and in Georgia in particular, great strides in election security have been made in just the past few months.

First, Georgia is joining several states, including Delaware, Pennsylvan­ia and South Carolina, in replacing its paperless touchscree­n voting machines by 2020. These machines are old and fail to provide a paper ballot that can be audited to ensure there’s been no tampering. Secretary of State Brad Raffensper­ger announced late last month that new machines would be purchased and deployed in time for the 2020 elections. These “ballot marking devices” (or BMDs) allow all voters, including those with disabiliti­es and language needs, to mark a ballot independen­tly and easily, using a touchscree­n, and once the ballot is complete, produces an official, human-readable paper ballot that can be independen­tly counted and audited for accuracy.

Beginning in March 2020, in time for the presidenti­al primary, every Georgia voter will have the security of knowing they can verify and cast an auditable paper ballot, joining the estimated 90% of Americans who will do the same in 2020. And those ballots aren’t just “auditable,” they will in fact be audited, as the legislatur­e required in the last session.

There have been concerns raised by a few activists about these devices, alleging BMDs cannot produce an auditable record and are more vulnerable than hand-marked ballots. These activists similarly fret that these ballots won’t be verified by the voters and often have QR codes on them that could be manipulate­d. None of these concerns are supported by the evidence. As recently documented in a paper by computer science professor Dan Wallach of Rice University, a noted election technology expert, BMDs are fully auditable and can be at least as secure as hand-marked ballots.

Even with QR codes, the paper ballot is human readable, and it is the human readable portion that is checked during the audit. If a malicious actor sought to corrupt the codes or any other part of the ballot, it would be discovered in the audit, and the human readable portion of the ballot will be the official ballot. And as noted by Prof. Wallach, it is highly likely a sufficient number of voters will verify their ballot, and there are tools election officials will use to maximize verificati­on, including good signage (required by Georgia law), live audits and reminders from poll workers.

In addition, BMDs have several advantages. BMDs allow voters with disabiliti­es and other needs to vote fully independen­tly, on ballots that can be verified and audited, whereas many such voters cannot vote independen­tly with a pen. BMDs also eliminate the possibilit­ies — experience­d in significan­t numbers in states where ballots are marked in pen — of a voter invalidati­ng their vote by voting more than allowed in any race and reduce the possibilit­y of forgetting to vote in an important race or mismarking a ballot so the counting machines don’t recognize the vote.

Thus, Prof. Wallach, along with many other election technology experts, has concluded “BMDs give us the security benefits of paper with the accessibil­ity benefits of computers.”

And for those who still, despite all the evidence, prefer to mark a paper ballot by pen, Georgia, like the majority of states, has the answer. Every registered voter in Georgia can request an absentee ballot by mail, enabling them to personally mark that ballot. Yes, the odds that the hand-marked ballot will contain errors is higher, but in Georgia, all voters have a choice.

Over the next several months, the state will be working with local election officials and other experts to implement rules that will ensure effective audits, accessibil­ity and strong security. This process began earlier this month with a roundtable I helped host with cybersecur­ity and election experts from around the state and the country. Beginning next March, voters in Georgia will experience an easy and accessible process and can vote knowing their ballot is more secure than ever.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States