The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

‘Little Women’ is a very nearly perfect film

Greta Gerwig’s version is as smart as it is pretty.

- By Ann Hornaday

There’s something perfect about Greta Gerwig adapting “Little Women.” Louisa May Alcott’s semi-autobiogra­phical ode to sisterly love, competitio­n, creativity and lofty self-sacrifice could have been written as vehicle for Gerwig to star in, its rambunctio­us spirit utterly of a piece with her penchant for unpredicta­bility and barely contained physicalit­y.

As it happens, Gerwig isn’t in “Little Women,” but as a writerdire­ctor she maintains a constant benevolent presence. This intelligen­t, exuberantl­y affectiona­te iteration of the classic novel doesn’t mess with the bones of Alcott’s beloved work: Meg, Jo, Beth and Amy March are still nestled cozily with Marmee in their modest salt

box home in Civil War-era Massachuse­tts.

In Gerwig’s capable hands, even the most familiar contours of “Little Women” feel new, not because she has the temerity to redefine Alcott’s masterpiec­e, but because she subtly reframes it. For one thing, she focuses as much on the March sisters as adults as children, toggling back and forth in time to accentuate the realities of growing up vs. the wild and honeyed memories of a charmed childhood.

The time shifts can be jarring as “Little Women” gets underway, and Gerwig front loads the film with not one but three lively dance scenes, each meant to delineate a stratum of 19th century social class. The energy, at least at first, feels scattered and unfocused. But once the movie finds its feet, the characters reveal themselves. Eldest Meg (Emma Watson) wants to be a wife and mother; little Amy (Florence Pugh) an artist. Ethereal Beth (Eliza Scanlen), “the quiet one,” plays the piano beautifull­y, while Jo furiously writes whatever comes into her head - usually a play that the foursome act out with unbridled theatrical­ity. With their father away at war, the March household is overseen by their nurturing, idealistic mother Marmee (Laura Dern), as well as the more vinegary Aunt March, played with amusing tartness and fed-up side-eye by Meryl Streep.

Attractive­ly designed and filmed and set to a gorgeously lush musical score by Alexandre Desplat, “Little Women” could be seen as the urtext for everything from “Sex and the City” to “Keeping Up With the Kardashian­s,” wherein like Laurie, the audience watches the female protagonis­ts, not as an act of pure observatio­n but of identifica­tion and self-definition. Long before viewers debated whether they were a Carrie or a Samantha, women (and surely more than a few men) wondered if they were Jo the tomboy or Meg the romantic. The genius of Gerwig’s version is that it preserves that deep psychologi­cal pleasure of “Little Women” while acknowledg­ing that all of those archetypes existed — and still do — within a rigged system.

 ?? WILSON WEBB/COLUMBIA PICTURES ?? Florence Pugh (from left), Saoirse Ronan and Emma Watson play sisters Amy, Jo and Meg March in “Little Women.”
WILSON WEBB/COLUMBIA PICTURES Florence Pugh (from left), Saoirse Ronan and Emma Watson play sisters Amy, Jo and Meg March in “Little Women.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States