The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Women take a few big steps forward

- Gail Collins She writes for the New York Times.

We’ve spent a remarkable amount of time this past week discussing whether there’s sexism in politics. Hahahahaha

OK, no need to be cynical. Let’s look on the positive side first. If you are around Elizabeth Warren’s age of 70, you’ve had the incredible luck to live through a period of history in which American women’s rights and opportunit­ies have been transforme­d. There are still people alive who were born when women couldn’t vote. Now we’ve got Nancy Pelosi giving a herd of male leaders their marching orders in Congress.

This doesn’t mean all the battles are won. We’ve got only nine female governors, and a lot of people of both sexes really don’t believe the country will elect any female president.

How you look at this depends a lot on why you think Hillary Clinton lost. Yes, she did get 2.8 million more votes than Donald Trump. But we can’t spend the day bewailing the existence of the Electoral College.

You understand we need to move on here, right? Personally, I’ve always suspected Clinton lost not so much because of her gender as because people just wanted a change. She’d been a starring player in two eight-year administra­tions.

The whole can-a-woman-be-president issue came up during last week’s debate. Warren had one of her best moments when she pointed out the male candidates with whom she shared the stage had collective­ly lost 10 elections, while the women hadn’t lost a single one.

And besides, she added, she was the only person onstage who had defeated an incumbent Republican in the past 30 years. Bernie Sanders — who contribute­d seven of those losses — quickly volunteere­d he had beaten a Republican incumbent in 1990. Which Warren, despite her career as a primary-school teacher, claimed was not within the past 30 years.

Joe Biden didn’t point out he beat a Republican incumbent to win his Senate seat in 1972. This is worth mentioning since some people worry that one of the Democrats’ leading candidates seems to kind of be living in the past.

About Biden. This is his third run for president. Who among us could forget 2008, when he came in fifth in Iowa and dropped out? Or 1988, when he — OK, you did forget 1988. Totally understand.

When it comes to gender bias, in the past Biden agreed Clinton faced it to an “unfair” degree. Then he added, “That’s not going to happen with me.”

His campaign later claimed his statement did not, um, mean what it sort of sounded like it meant.

So, about sexism in politics. Absolutely there, especially at the highest levels. But dissolving rapidly in places where women are proving what terrific vote-getters they are. We have 26 women in the Senate now — nearly half the all-of-American-history total. Seventeen are Democrats.

This little detail gives us an opportunit­y to recall the days when the Republican Party was progressiv­e enough to have serious arguments about whether a woman could win the presidency. Remember the glorious Sen. Margaret Chase Smith? She ran for the nomination in 1964, when she was 66. A columnist for the Los Angeles Times argued she was too old and added that when women hit the ideal age for running in their late 40s or early 50s, they are utterly unfit for office, since they are undergoing the “physical changes and emotional distress” of menopause.

So you have to admit things have been getting better. For women, that is.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States