The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

» Democratic prosecutor­s say “bogus” Ukraine theory led to Trump’s abuse of power,

President misused power in 10 separate ways for political benefit in 2020 election, House prosecutor­s argue.

- By Lisa Mascaro, Eric Tucker and Zeke Miller | Associated Press

WASHINGTON — Democratic House prosecutor­s argued in President Donald Trump’s impeachmen­t trial Thursday that he was swept up by a “completely bogus” Ukraine theory pushed by attorney Rudy Giuliani that led to his abuse of presidenti­al power and then impeachmen­t.

What happened

As the Democrats pressed their case for a second day before skeptical Republican Senate jurors, they displayed video images of the nation’s top FBI and Homeland Security officials warning the public off the theory that it was Ukraine, not Russia, that interfered in the 2016 election.

It was just one of 10 separate ways, the prosecutor­s argued, that Trump abused power for his own personal political benefit ahead of the 2020 election — the first article of impeachmen­t against him.

“That’s what Donald Trump wanted investigat­ed or announced: this completely bogus Kremlin-pushed conspiracy theory,” said Rep. Adam Schiff, the chairman of the House Intelligen­ce Committee who is leading the prosecutio­n.

Trump is accused of seeking the investigat­ion — and probes of political foe Joe Biden and Biden’s son — while holding back congressio­nally approved military aid as leverage.

Trump is facing trial in the Senate after the House impeached him last month, accusing him of abusing his office by asking Ukraine for the investigat­ions while withholdin­g the aid from a U.S. ally at war with bordering Russia. The second article of impeachmen­t accuses him of obstructin­g Congress by refusing to turn over documents or allow officials to testify in the House probe.

Republican­s, growing tired of the long hours of proceeding­s, have defended Trump’s actions as appropriat­e and say the process is a politicall­y motivated effort to weaken him in the midst of his reelection campaign. Republican­s hold a 53-47 majority in the Senate, and acquittal is considered likely.

The Democrats’ challenge is clear as they try to convince not just fidgety senators but an American public divided over the Republican president in an election year.

With Chief Justice John Roberts presiding, Democrats argued on Thursday that Trump’s motives were apparent.

“No president has ever used his office to compel a foreign nation to help him cheat in our elections,” Rep. Jerrold Nadler of New York, the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, told the senators. He said the nation’s founders would be shocked. “The president’s conduct is wrong. It is illegal. It is dangerous.”

They disagreed with Trump’s claim he had good reasons for pressuring Ukraine to investigat­e his political foes.

It was Trump who engaged in a shocking abuse of power, not former Vice President Biden or other Trump foes, said Rep. Sylvia Garcia of Texas. There is “no evidence, nothing, nada” to suggest that Biden did anything improper in dealings with Ukraine, said the former judge.

Trump, with Giuliani, pursued investigat­ions of Biden and his son Hunter, who served on a Ukrainian gas company’s board, and sought the probe of theories of what nation was guilty of interferen­ce in the 2016 U.S. election.

On dual tracks, Democrats prosecuted their case while answering in advance the arguments expected from the president’s attorneys in the days ahead.

At one point, they showed video of a younger Lindsey Graham, then a South Carolina congressma­n and now a GOP senator allied with Trump, arguing during Bill Clinton’s 1999 impeachmen­t that no crime was needed for impeaching a president. Trump’s defense team is now arguing that the impeachmen­t articles against the president are invalid because they do not allege he committed a specific crime.

About defenders’ turn

The president’s defenders waited their turn, which may come on Saturday.

“We will be putting on a vigorous defense of both facts, rebutting what they said,” and the Constituti­on, said attorney Jay Sekulow.

Ahead of the day’s proceeding­s, Sen. Roy Blunt of Missouri said the Democrats were putting forward “admirable presentati­ons.” But he said, “They’ve basically got about one hour of presentati­on, and they gave it six times on Tuesday and eight times yesterday. There’s just not much new here.”

On Thursday morning, Trump tweeted: “Most unfair & corrupt hearing in Congressio­nal history!”

What’s next

Each side has up to three days to present its case. After the House prosecutor­s finish, likely today, the president’s lawyers will have as long as 24 hours. It’s unclear how much time they will actually take, but Trump’s team is not expected to finish Saturday, according to a person unauthoriz­ed to discuss the planning and granted anonymity. The Senate is expected to take only Sunday off and push into next week.

After that senators will face the question of whether they want to call witnesses to testify.

 ??  ??
 ?? SENATE TELEVISION ?? “That’s what Donald Trump wanted investigat­ed or announced: this completely bogus Kremlin-pushed conspiracy theory,” said Rep. Adam Schiff, who is leading the prosecutio­n.
SENATE TELEVISION “That’s what Donald Trump wanted investigat­ed or announced: this completely bogus Kremlin-pushed conspiracy theory,” said Rep. Adam Schiff, who is leading the prosecutio­n.
 ?? JOSE LUIS MAGANA / ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., seen Thursday on Capitol Hill, was shown later by Democrats in a video arguing in 1999 that no crime was needed to impeach a president.
JOSE LUIS MAGANA / ASSOCIATED PRESS Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., seen Thursday on Capitol Hill, was shown later by Democrats in a video arguing in 1999 that no crime was needed to impeach a president.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States