The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
School aim to keep up nutritional value
State supports federal policy’s new options, will maintain quality.
Newly proposed changes by the federal government for school lunches received mixed reactions from nutritionists and children’s health advocates across the country.
The rules for the Food and Nutrition Service would allow schools to reduce the amount of vegetables and fruits required at lunch
and breakfasts while giving them license to sell more pizza, burgers and fries to students.
From a cost standpoint, school officials say anything that will reduce food waste is a good thing, especially for taxpayers. However, studentsneed healthy
options, say state and metro Atlanta nutrition experts. They worry that allowing school districts laxity, children will pick the least-healthy choice every day.
Those officials say no matter how
the Department of Agriculture regulations may change, they’ve found ways to make healthy foods appetizing for students and will continue to offer the most nutritious meals possible.
Linette Dodson, school nutrition director for the Georgia Department of Education, said headlines declaring “school lunches will now consist of junk food” confuses the issue for parents and students. “This isn’t the final rule,” Dodson
said. “There’s a 60-day window for public comment and there could be some modifications during that
time.”
Dodson said the state supports the flexibility in the proposed plan but will maintain the quality standards that have been in place across Georgia for years.
“We have programs such as Farm to School and Georgia Grown that improve the nutritional value of student meals and help the local economy,” she said. “Those programs have proven successful and sustainable.”
Fulton County Public Schools has been involved in the Farm to School program since 2011, said Ruth Taylor, the district’s School Nutrition Program coordinator. “We achieved platinum status in the Georgia Organics’ Golden Radish award and have maintained it since.”
That designation means Fulton County schools fulfilled 10 criteria involving locally sourced foods and education practices:
■ Offer locally grown items on the school menu,
■ Offer students taste tests that feature locally grown food,
■ Have students interact with farmers through field trips or visits to school,
■ Produce Farm to School promotions in schools,
■ Integrate farm to school into standards-based curriculum,
■ Maintain edible school gardens,
■ Have students participate in hands-on cooking and food activities featuring local food with chefs,
■ Have parents and/or community members involved in the farm to school program,
■ Have staff participate in farm to school professional development training,
■ Have Farm to School language as part of a district-wide policy or procedure.
‘It’s kind of like art’
Adding fresh fruits and vegetables such as strawberries or cucumbers to flavor water is currently not an option for schools. Under the proposal the administrative restrictions would be lifted. And making a meat or meat alternate easily available for breakfast rather than the grains that are now required is another easy fix, according to many nutritionists.
“It allows students to choose turkey sausage, cheese, yogurt, eggs or peanut butter as an option for whole grain products,” said Dodson.
But many critics of the proposed guidelines draw the line when it comes to the definitions of fruits and vegetables. Under the proposal, French fries may be considered a vegetable that can substituted for leafy greens, and pasta could replace fruits.
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution recently visited Heards Ferry Elementary in Sandy Springs to observe the school lunch program there. District Chef Reggie Sloan walked a reporter through lunch prep. Sloan and Taylor explained the process involved in providing 11 million breakfasts and lunches each year.
Although there were industrial-sized stoves and machines, food was prepared in batches. As one food service worker dished out individual portions of salad, she took care to ensure the presentation was appetizing.
“It’s kind of like art,” said Taylor. “The food is colorful and arranged in appealing ways, so the students want to eat it.”
Even the Szechuan chicken and fried rice that made up one of the day’s hot entrees was bursting with color and freshness. The rice is not really fried, because fried foods aren’t allowed in schools that are part of the USDA school nutrition program.
“We offer two hot entrees and one cold every day,” said Taylor. “And always at least one vegetarian option.”
That day kids had bento boxes with hummus and fresh veggies, which proved to be a popular item.
As the first wave of students entered the cafeteria, they waved and called “Hello” to Chef Reggie. As the smallest kids at school, the pre-K kids deftly managed trays piled with selections from all food groups.
“District-wide we serve about 50,000 lunches and 25,000 breakfasts,” said Taylor. “We have about 30 minutes in the morning to get everyone fed who’s taking breakfast, and anywhere from two to three hours in the afternoon for lunch.”
With such a tight window to make the nutrition programs work, the most welcomed changes may be the ones the public will never see. The proposal changes the timeline of the administrative review (an audit which currently occurs every three years) to every five years.
This change would allow school food service professionals more time to enhance their programs and would allow state agency oversight staff more time for technical assistance to districts struggling to meet federal standards, said Dodson.
“The most important thing to remember is that these proposals are for minimum standards,” said Dodson. “We’ve found that most school districts are way above those standards and plan to remain there.”
Taylor added that parents are always welcome to see what kids are eating at school.
“We work to maintain nutritional integrity,” said Taylor. “We don’t change the ultimate guidelines. Our job is to feed children the healthiest meals possible to support educational achievement.”