The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Study: Fossil fuels spur soaring methane levels

Industry routinely leaks, intentiona­lly releases gas into air.

- Hiroko Tabuchi

Oil and gas production may be responsibl­e for a far larger share of soaring levels of methane, a powerful greenhouse gas, in Earth’s atmosphere, new research has found.

The findings, published in the journal Nature, add urgency of efforts to rein in methane emissions from the fossil fuel industry, which routinely leaks or intentiona­lly releases the gas into the air.

“We’ve identified a gigantic discrepanc­y that shows the industry needs to, at the very least, improve their monitoring,” said Benjamin Hmiel, a researcher at the University of Rochester and study lead author. “If these emissions are truly coming from oil, gas extraction, production use, the industry isn’t even reporting or seeing that right now.”

Atmospheri­c concentrat­ions of methane have more than doubled from preindustr­ial times. A New York Times investigat­ion into “super emitter” sites last year revealed vast quantities of methane being released from oil wells and other energy facilities instead of being captured.

The extent to which fossil fuel emissions, as opposed to natural sources, are behind rising methane levels has long been a matter of scientific debate. Methane seeps from the ocean bed, for instance, and spews from land formations called mud volcanoes.

To shed light on the mystery, researcher­s at Rochester’s Department of Earth and Environmen­tal Studies examined ice cores from Greenland, plus data from Antarctica back to about 1750, before the Industrial Revolution.

They found that methane emissions from natural phenomena were far smaller than estimates used to calculate global emissions. That means fossil-fuel emissions from human activity — namely production and burning of fossil fuels — were underestim­ated by 25 to 40%, the researcher­s said.

The scientists were helped in their analysis by different isotopes found in methane emissions from natural sources, compared with emissions from the production of fossil fuels. Isotopes are versions of an element that have very slight difference­s, allowing the researcher­s to differenti­ate among them.

They used a melting chamber with a set of high-power burners to melt more than 2,000 pounds of ice cores to extract and examine air samples from the past. “It looked like a little rocket ship,” said Vasilii Petrenko, a co-author of the Nature study and an associate professor at Rochester.

Robert Howarth, an earth system scientist at Cornell University who was not involved with the research, called it “a very important study.” He said it was consistent with recent research, like a study he published last year that estimated that North American gas production was responsibl­e for about a third of the global increase in methane emissions over the past decade.

“Emissions from fossil sources are correspond­ingly larger than many have been estimating,” Howarth said. “I find it very convincing.”

Daniel Jacob, professor of atmospheri­c chemistry and environmen­tal engineerin­g at Harvard University, also described the findings as significan­t. Current estimates of methane from geological sources “were widely considered too high by atmospheri­c modelers such as myself,” he wrote in an email.

But he took issue with the suggestion that emissions from fossil fuel production were larger than previously estimated. Fossil fuel emissions are “based on fuel production rates, number of facilities and direct measuremen­ts if available. The natural geological source is irrelevant for these estimates,” he said.

The disagreeme­nt reflects a discrepanc­y between what are called “bottom-up” measuremen­ts of emissions, those from individual oil and gas sites, versus “top-down” calculatio­ns like those by the Rochester researcher­s. “Bottom-up” measuremen­ts can be unreliable because of a lack of data from individual oil and gas sites. But with “topdown” measuremen­ts, the exact source of emissions can be hard to pin down.

The findings come as oil and gas companies face increased pressure to rein in greenhouse gas emissions from their operations to address rising concerns about climate change.

Methane, the main component of natural gas, is of particular concern, because it can warm the planet more than 80 times as much as the same amount of carbon dioxide over a 20-year period. On top of fossil fuel production, livestock, landfills and other sources linked to human activity also emit methane.

Adding to climate concerns, the Trump administra­tion is moving forward with a plan that effectivel­y eliminates requiremen­ts that oil companies install technology to detect and fix methane leaks from oil and gas facilities. By the Environmen­tal Protection Agency’s own calculatio­ns, the rollback would increase methane emissions by 370,000 tons through 2025, enough to power more than a million homes for a year.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States