The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

As the startup boom deflates, tech is humbled

- Erin Griffith

SAN FRANCISCO — Over the past decade, technology startups grew so quickly that they couldn’t hire people fast enough.

Now the lay off shave started coming in droves. Lastmonth, robot pizza startup Zume and car-sharing company Getaround slashed more than 500 jobs. Then DNA testing company 23andMe, logistics startup Flexport, Firefox maker Mozilla and question-and-answer website Quora did their own cuts.

“It feels like a reckoning is here,” said Josh Wolfe, a venture capitalist at Lux Capital in New York.

It’s a humbling shift for an industry that long saw itself as an engine of job creation and innovation, producing ride-hailing giant Uber, hospitalit­y company Airbnb and other now well-known brands that often disrupted entrenched industries.

Their rise was propelled by a wave of investor money — about $763 billion washed into startups in the United States over the past decade — that also fueled the growth of young companies in delivery, cannabis, real estate and direct-to-consumer goods.

Unlike low-cost software startups, these private companies frequently took on oldline competitor­s by spending heavily on physical assets and workers while losing money.

Now a pullback is unfolding in precisely the areas that drew the most hype.

Around the world, more than 30 startups have slashed more than 8,000 jobs over the past fourmonths, according to a tally by The New York Times. Investment­s in young companies have fallen, with 2,215 startups raising money in the United States in the last three months of 2019, the fewest since late 2016, according to the National Venture Capital Associatio­n and Pitch Book,

which track startups.

And those are not the only signs of change. Casper Sleep, which billed itself as the “Nike of sleep” by selling mattresses online, flopped when it went public last month. Once-hot companies like Lime, the electric scooter provider, have pulled out of some cities. Others, like e- commerce startup Brandless, game app HQ Trivia and electronic­s maker Essential Products, are on the verge of shutting down.

There are now “frantic mini-moments of panic, asone thing after another happens,” said Roy Bahat, an investor at Bloomberg’s venture arm in

San Francisco .“At some point, one rock after another will fall away fromthe cliff, and we’ll realize we’re not standing on anything inmany, many companies.”

Many startups are sagging after a difficult 2019, when prominent “unicorns”— companies valued at $1 billion or more by private investors—fell

flflat on Wall Street. Uber and Lyft, which are losing billions of dollars a year, st aged disappoint­ing initial public of fe rings last spring. And We Work, the office rental firm, pulled its public offering, ousted its chief executive and cut its valuation by 80% late last year.

There treats are being led by companies that were backed by Soft Bank, the Japanese conglomera­te with a $100 billion Vision Fund for investing in startups. Soft Bank bet big on companies like Uber and We Work, as well as Colombian delivery startup Rappi and Indian hospitalit­y startup Oyo. All have undergone layoffs in recent months.

“You can’t build on top of something that’s not strong,” said Seth Besmertnik, chief executive of Conductor, a marketing business that We Work acquired in 2018, which he and others recently bought back. This month, Soft Bank reported that its Vision Fund and other investment­s led to a $2 billion operating loss in the last quarter of 2019. In a statement, it said some of its startups had acted “quickly and responsibl­y to make some difficult decisions to better position themselves for longterm success.”

The pull back will probably not be as severe as the dotcom bust in the early 2000s, when dozens of unprofitab­le internet firms failed. Today, venture capitalist­s and other investors still have large pools of money to invest. And certain types of startups — like those that make tech for businesses and that typically have steady sales — continue raising large sums of money.

But in an industry known for irrational optimism, skepticism now abounds. In San Francisco, entreprene­urs are quietly sharing tales of skittish investors and a struggle to adapt to a new reality. Spreadshee­ts of freshly unemployed workers are circulatin­g on social media.

Perhaps the most drastic turn has happened among cannabis startups, which rode a wave of exuberance in recent years as countries like Canada and Uruguay and several U.S. states loosened laws that criminaliz­ed the drug. Last year, more than 300 cannabis companies raised $2.6 billion in venture capital, according to Pitch Book.

Then in mid-2019, investors started doubting whether the industry could deliver on its lofty promises when some publicly traded cannabis companies were tarred by illegal growing scandals and regulatory crackdowns. Startups like Caliva, a cannabis producer; Eaze, a delivery service; and Nor Cal Cannabis Co., another producer, have together cut hundreds of members of their staffs in recent months.

“A lot of companies are not going to make it through this year,” said Brendan Kenney, chief executive of Tilray, a cannabis producer that went public in 2018. Kenney said he was stopping spending on new projects to survive the shakeout.

Even a startup named Unicorn hasn’t been spared. The company, which sold personal electric scooters, raised just over $150,000 last year from investors. But it quickly spent the cash on online ads and got just 350 orders, said Nick Evans, its founder.

In December, Unicorn said it could not afford to deliver any scooters and shut down. Evans ended up giving some customers refunds with his own money, he said.

 ?? CASPER ?? Casper Sleep, which billed itself as the “Nike of sleep” by sellingmat­tresses online, flfloppedw­hen itwent public lastmonth.
CASPER Casper Sleep, which billed itself as the “Nike of sleep” by sellingmat­tresses online, flfloppedw­hen itwent public lastmonth.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States