Shifts in voting should alarm Trump about Biden’s success

2020 is not 2016. That is very good news for Joe Biden, sad news for Bernie Sanders and deeply disturbing news for President Trump.

The differences between the two elections are why the former vice president won resounding victories in Tuesday’s primaries in Michigan, Mississippi and Missouri, and why he is now in a nearly impregnable position in the Democratic presidential contest.

Biden is showing strengths at this stage of the campaign Hillary Clinton, the party’s 2016 nominee, did not. And he is pushing Sanders back into his core vote among the young and the left end of the Democratic electorate. Far from expanding, the Sanders electorate is shrinking.

What should alarm supporters of Trump is Biden’s success in rural and smalltown counties in Michigan that Clinton lost to Sanders in 2016. Trump cannot afford any deterioration of his support in these areas that formed his base.

Just as disturbing for Republican strategists is a shift away from Sanders and toward Biden among Michigan’s white voters, upscale and blue collar alike. In 2016, Sanders carried white college graduates by a decent margin and whites without college degrees by even more. On Tuesday, both groups swung to Biden.

And if Trump’s backing among his core groups is in jeopardy, Democrats are energized in their opposition to him not simply from discontent but from outright anger. For example, among the voters in Michigan, better than 6 in 10 told the Edison Media Research exit poll the Trump administration made them angry. Almost all of the rest said they were dissatisfied.

Thus, in primary after primary, Democratic voters have made clear ridding the nation of Trump matters more to them than any particular issue.

Whatever his shortcomings, Biden does not appear to arouse the same passionate opposition Clinton did. That at least some of the hostility to her was rooted in sexism is inarguable. A long campaign by Republicans to undermine her certainly took its toll.

The upshot is that when Clinton narrowly lost the Michigan primary to Sanders four years ago, 40% of those surveyed by exit pollsters answered “no” when asked if she was “honest and trustworthy.” Only 11% offered this negative verdict on Sanders, and that was one key to his upset victory.

But without Clinton to run against, Sanders’ candidacy is much weaker. It’s now clear from the primaries so far many of Sanders’ 2016 ballots came from voters who did not necessarily agree with his progressive-populist political views but were motivated by hostility to Clinton.

It should be said Biden’s backers were not of the ecstatic sort — just 3 in 10 among Michigan’s voters said they would be enthusiastic if Biden won the nomination. But another 4 in 10 said they would be satisfied if he were the nominee — and just 1 in 10 said this would upset them. It reflects a quiet judgment Biden is a safe choice who will not alienate voters Democrats need against Trump.

“Tonight, we are a step closer to restoring decency, dignity and honor to the White House,” Biden said in Philadelphia, where he was speaking after canceling a rally in response to the rising coronavirus threat. He spoke not boastfully but calmly and deliberately. In so doing, he underscored what he hopes to portray in the coming weeks as his strengths in contrast to Trump’s flailing in the face of a global health emergency.