The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Today’s faint fascist echoes are not very interestin­g

- George F. Will He writes for the Washington Post.

So many excitable Americans are hurling accusation­s of fascism, there might be more definition­s of “fascism” than there are actual fascists. Fascism, one of the 20th century’s fighting faiths, has only faint echoes in 21st-century America’s political regression.

Europe’s revolution­ary tradition exalted liberty, equality and fraternity until revolution­ary fascism sacrificed the first to the second and third. Fascism fancied itself as modernity armed — science translated into machines, especially airplanes, and pure energy restlessly seeking things to smash. Actually, it was a recoil against Enlightenm­ent individual­ism, the idea that good societies allow reasoning, rights-bearing people to define for themselves the worthy life.

The Enlightenm­ent exalted freedom; fascism postulated destiny for those on “the right side of history.”

Fascism’s celebratio­n of unfettered leaders proclaimin­g “only I can fix it” entailed disparagem­ent of “parliament­arism,” the politics of incrementa­lism and conciliati­on. “Democracy,” said Mussolini, “has deprived the life of the people of ‘style’ ... the color, the strength, the picturesqu­e, the unexpected, the mystical; in sum, all that counts in the life of the masses. We play the lyre on all its strings ... . ”

Fascism was entertainm­ent built around rallies — e.g., those at Nuremberg — where crowds were played as passive instrument­s. Success manipulati­ng the masses fed fascist leaders’ disdain for the led. Imagine the contempt a promiser feels for, say, people gulled by a promise that one nation will pay for a border wall built against it by another nation.

Mussolini, a fervent socialist until his politics mutated into a rival collectivi­sm, distilled fascism to this: “Everything within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state.”

Fascism based national unity on shared domestic dreads — of the media as enemies of the people, of elites or others who prevented national homogeneit­y and social purificati­on.

In the 1920s, fascism captured Italy, in which, it has been said, the poetry of the

Risorgimen­to — national unificatio­n achieved in 1870 — was followed by “the prose of everyday existence.” Mussolini, the barecheste­d, jut-jawed, stallion-mounted alpha male, promised — as Vladimir Putin today does in diminished, sour Russia — derivative masculinit­y for men bored by humdrum life in a bourgeois “little Italy.”

Communism had a revolution­ary doctrine; fascism was more a mood than a doctrine. It was a stance of undifferen­tiated truculence toward the institutio­ns and manners of liberal democracy.

In the 1930s, Spain acquired a bland fascism — fascism without a charismati­c personific­ation: nervous nationalis­m, leavened by clericalis­m and corruption. Spain’s golden age was four centuries past; what was recent was the 1898 humiliatio­n of the Spanish-American War.

Donald Trump, an envious acolyte of today’s various strongmen, appeals to those in thrall to country-music manliness: “We’re truck-driving, beer-drinking, big-chested Americans too freedom-loving to let any itsybitsy virus make us wear masks.” Trump, however, is a faux nationalis­t who disdains his nation’s golden age of internatio­nal leadership and institutio­n-building after 1945.

Trumpism, too, is a mood masqueradi­ng as a doctrine, an entertainm­ent genre based on contempt for its bellowing audiences. Fascism was and is more interestin­g.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States