The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Biden faces tough lockdown choices

Any such moves would need bipartisan support from state, local officials.

-

WASHINGTON— Joe Biden faces a decision unlike any other incoming president: whether to back a short-term national lockdown to finally arrest a raging pandemic.

For now, it’s a question the president-elect would prefer to avoid. Biden has devoted most of his public remarks to encouragin­g Americans to wear a mask and view the coronaviru­s as a threat that has no regard for political ideology.

But the debate has been livelier among members of the corona virus advisory board Biden announced lastweek. Onemember, Dr. Michael Osterholm, suggested a four- to sixweek lockdown with financial aid for Americans whose livelihood­s would be affected. He later walked back his remarks and was rebutted by two other members of the panel who said a widespread lockdown shouldn’t be under considerat­ion.

That’ s a sign of the tough dynamic Biden will face when he is inaugurate­d in January. He campaigned as a more responsibl­e steward of America’ s public health than President Donald Trump is and has been blunt about the challenges that lie ahead for the country, warning of a “dark winter” as cases spike.

But talk of lock downs is sensitive. For one, they’re nearly impossible for a president to enact onhis own, requiring bipartisan support from state and local officials.

“Itwould create abacklash,” said Dr. Amesh Adalja, a senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, who added that such a move could make the situation worse if people don’t comply with restrictio­ns. “Lockdowns can have consequenc­es that diminish the value of such an approach.”

During his first public appearance since losing the election, Trump noted Friday he wouldn’t support a lockdown. The president, who has yet to publicly acknowledg­e Biden’s victory, would likely reinforce that message to his loyal supporters once he’s left office.

Still, the pandemic’s toll continues to escalate.

The coronaviru­s is blamed for 10.6 million confirmed infections and almost a quarter-million deaths in the U.S., with the closelywat­ched University of Washington model projecting nearly 439,000 dead by March 1. Deaths have climbed to about 1,000 a day on average.

New cases per day are soaring, shattering records. The latest came Friday, when more than 184,000 people tested positive, according to data from Johns Hopkins University.

Several states are beginning to bring back some of the restrictio­ns first imposed during the spring. But leaders in much of the country are proceeding with caution, aware that Americans are already fatigued by virus-related disruption­s.

Indeed, after O st er holm made his comments, a number of Bid en’ s task force members went out to publicly disavow lockdown possibilit­ies. Dr. Vivek Murthy, the former U.S. surgeon general who’s serving as one of the co-chairs on Biden’s coronaviru­s advisory board, said the group is looking at a “series of restrictio­ns that we dial up or down” based on the severity of the virus in a given region.

“We’re not in a place where we’re saying shut the whole country down. We’ve got to be more targeted,” Murthy said on ABC’s “Good Morning America.” “If we don’t do that, what you’re going to find is that people will become even more fatigued. Schools won’t be open to children, and the economy will be hit harder, so we’ve got to follow science, but we’ve also got to be more precise.”

Speaking on CNBC, Dr. Celine Grounder, an infectious-disease specialist at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine and another task force member, said, “as a group, really the consensus is that we need a more nuanced approach.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States