The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Trump leaving important global matters to Biden

- Pat Buchanan Hewrites for Creators Syndicate.

Dismissing President Donald Trump’s claim the 2020 election remains undecided, Joe Biden has begun to name his national security team.

Right now, it looks Democratic establishm­ent all the way.

Antony Blinken, a longtime foreign policy aide, is Biden’s choice for secretary of state. Jake Sullivan, one of Hillary Clinton’s closest aides, is his choice for national security adviser.

Biden’s urgency in naming his foreign policy team is understand­able.

For if his election is confirmed by the Electoral College, then he will find himself Jan. 20 with a lineup of foreign policy crises.

First is Afghanista­n. While a Beltway battle has erupted over the wisdom of Trump’s decision to cut in half, to 2,500, the number of U. S. troops in Afghanista­n by Jan. 15, no one denies the risk this entails for the besieged pro- American government in Kabul.

Ex- Ambassador to Afghanista­n and Pakistan Ryan Crocker summed it up this month before the House Armed Services Committee: “The worst thing we can do is what we are doing. ... Basically telling the Taliban, ‘ You win. We lose. Let’s dress this up as best we can.’”

America “is waving the white flag” of surrender, said Crocker.

As President Biden is not going to send fresh regiments of U. S. troops back to Afghanista­n, he could, in his first year, face a collapse of the Kabul regime and a triumph of the Taliban, whom we expelled from power 19 years ago for hosting the al- Qaida terrorists who perpetrate­d 9/ 11.

Biden could, in his first days in office, preside over the first U. S. defeat in a major war since Vietnam.

A second situation confrontin­g the new president is China. For the China of 2021 is not the China with which Barack Obama and Biden had to deal. The China of today revels in its Communist ideology.

U. S. planes and ships flying close to Chinese territoria­l claims are intercepte­d and treated as hostile.

This is not a China that is going to back down before American power. If the U. S. imposes sanctions on Beijing, then Beijing will reciprocat­e with sanctions on the U. S. And if the U. S. decides to use force, the U. S. should not be surprised if China reciprocat­es in kind.

President Biden, it is said, will find a way to rejoin the Iran nuclear deal from which Trump rudely exited.

Then there are the human rights backslider­s that are U. S. partners and allies: Turkey, Egypt, Saudi Arabia. How does Biden deal with the party’s progressiv­es who demand he sanction such partner- nations — without risking the loss of these countries’ cooperatio­n on our policy agenda?

And the question with regard to Afghanista­n is also true of Syria and Iraq. How do we extract our military from these endless conflicts without losing any leverage we have, and with it losing our influence over the compositio­n and character of the regime and its direction?

“America First” has an answer to these questions:

If there are no vital U. S. interests imperiled, keep U. S. troops out. And ashcan the utopian nonsense of trying to plant democracy in the sandy soil of a Middle East that has shown itself unreceptiv­e to that particular crop.

The interventi­onalists got us into the sandbox. Let’s see if they can get us out.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States