The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Deloitte, Delta reach fuel deal
Delta Air Lines struck an agreement for consulting firm Deloitte to buy sustainable aviation fuel, part of an effort by the companies to reduce emissions and avoid government regulation. Deloitte committed in September to reaching net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2030.
What’s happening
Delta’s plans include using renewable energy in buildings, converting vehicles to hybrid and electric power, and reducing business travel. Its purchase of sustainable fuel for use by Delta will contribute to cleaner air overall and help Deloitte reach a goal of reducing carbon emissions for its business travel by 50%.
What it means
If major corporations like Deloitte significantly reduce business travel to meet sustainability goals, that poses a threat to future business for airlines like Delta. The Deloittedelta deal is aimed at mitigating some of the impact.
“There’s so much pressure from our customers for a solution,” Delta CEO Ed Bastian said in remarks during a Dealbook DC Policy Project event this week. “You hear the consultancies, the accounting firms, the financial services and technology companies that are saying, ‘Hey, airlines, you’re a big part of my footprint, so I’m having to reduce my travel to offset my footprint unless we can find a better answer together.’”
Delta is partnering with renewable fuel maker Neste.
More details
The airline said it will be able to offer sustainable air travel solutions to Deloitte and other corporate customers once it gets a fuel made with animal fat, expected to be delivered this summer to San Francisco International Airport, with which Neste has an agreement.
The fuel will be added to existing pipelines, so Delta plans to report emissions reductions associated with Deloitte’s flights on the airline regardless of which flights the fuel is used on.
Bastian pushed for incentives for sustainable aviation fuels rather than government regulation or fees, saying sustainable fuels cost probably 10 times as much as regular jet fuel. He said companies working together to reduce their carbon footprint is “where the real genius and opportunities come.”
In the span of a few hours this week, we saw multiple threads come together about the Capitol attack, again painting a picture of how fake claims of election fraud led to mob violence.
Just as the feds unveiled criminal charges Tuesday against a retired NYPD officer for a brutal attack on police outside the Capitol, one GOP senator claimed the Jan. 6 Capitol attack was not spurred by supporters of the president.
At a hearing, U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-wis., suggested ‘provocateurs’ and ‘fake Trump protesters’ were to blame, arguing ‘happy’ Trump supporters would never have engaged in such violence.
Charging documents tell a much different story.
“It was not antifa,” the feds quoted a Tennessee man who was charged Tuesday. Jose Padilla was part of a group that used a large Trump 2020 sign — “KEEP AMERICA GREAT” — to attack police stationed outside the Capitol.
“They were Patriots who were trying to Restore the Republic after being attacked by the cops,” Padilla wrote on his Facebook page.
Padilla’s words echoed one of the Georgians charged in the attack.
“President Trump is calling us to FIGHT,” said Bruno Joseph Cua, an 18-year-old metro Atlanta man who faces a 12-count
indictment.
Why were they at the Capitol ready to fight? Because they believed the election had been stolen from Donald Trump.
Back in Georgia during the Capitol attack hearing, ex-sen. David Perdue, R-GA., announced he would not run for U.S. Senate in 2022; in a statement, Perdue expressed support for changes in state election laws so that “illegal votes” won’t be counted.
Democrats argue those types of statements by Perdue and other Republicans are part of the underlying reason for the attack: that false charges of election fraud in 2020 convinced people they needed to stop Congress from ratifying Donald Trump’s defeat.
On Tuesday in Michigan, authorities charged a man for making direct threats against two members of Congress. The man promised violence if the election results were not changed.
On the same day, charges were also announced against a 43-year-old Georgia man who left a threatening voicemail for a Michigan state judge, alleging that “activist judges” were making court rulings
that wrongly favored President-elect Joe Biden.
The misplaced anger-fueled constantly by then-president Trump and some GOP officials boiled over here in Washington on Jan. 6.
Six weeks later, officials were still in shock.
“We properly planned for a mass demonstration with possible violence,” said former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund. “What we got was a military-style coordinated assault.”
Democrats pushed back on GOP suggestions that the attack was somehow not Trump-related.
“I want to make one thing clear: ‘Provocateurs’ did not storm the Capitol,” said U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-minn. “They were not fake Trump protesters.”
“That is disinformation,” Klobuchar added.
Jamie Dupree has covered national and the Congress from Washington, D.C., since the Reagan administration. His column will appear weekly in The Atlanta Journal-constitution. For more, check out his Capitol Hill newsletter at jamiedupree. substack.com