The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Closely-watched Amazon union vote heads to count

Outcome in Alabama has implicatio­ns for company, labor movement.

-

By the end of Monday, thousands of yellow envelopes mailed to a squat brick building in Birmingham, Alabama, held the fate of one of the most closely watched union elections in recent history, one that could alter the shape of the labor movement and one of America’s largest employers.

The envelopes contain the ballots of workers at an Amazon warehouse near Birmingham. Almost 6,000 workers at the building, one of Amazon’s largest, are eligible to decide whether they form the first union at an Amazon operation in the United States, after years of fierce resistance by the company.

The organizers have made the case in a monthslong campaign that Amazon’s intense monitoring of workers infringes on their dignity and that its pay is not commensura­te with the constant pressure workers feel to produce. The union estimates that roughly 85% of the workforce at the warehouse is Black and has linked the organizing to the struggle for racial justice.

Amazon has countered that its $15 minimum wage is twice the state minimum and that it offers health insurance and other benefits that can be hard to find in low-wage jobs.

“Even the fact that the vote is taking place is a referendum on the so-called future of work,” said Beth Gutelius, a researcher who studies the warehousin­g industry.

Whatever the outcome of the vote — which may not be known for days — the union drive has already succeeded in roiling the world’s biggest e-commerce company and spotlighti­ng complaints about its labor practices. The vote comes at a delicate time for the company, which faces increasing scrutiny in Washington and around the world for its market power and influence, which have grown during the pandemic as consumers flocked online to avoid stores. President Joe Biden has signaled his support for the workers, as have many progressiv­e leaders.

A union victory “may change the labor movement, as we have a shift in defining who are workers, who are union members,”

said Sara Nelson, president of the Associatio­n of Flight Attendants, who visited Bessemer this month and felt “overwhelmi­ng” local support for the union.

But if workers vote against the union, Nelson said, the result “would be pretty devastatin­g.” Nelson said “people would have a hard time believing it because of what they are experienci­ng on the ground.”

Amazon has said it does not believe the union represents the majority of its workers. Drew Herdener, Amazon’s vice president for worldwide communicat­ions, said in a statement that “our employees know the truth — starting wages of $15 or more, health care from day one, and a safe and inclusive workplace. We encouraged all of our employees to vote and hope they did so.”

Stuart Appelbaum, the union’s president, said in a statement that “even though we don’t know how the vote will turn out, we believe we have opened the door to more organizing around the country.” He added: “And we have exposed the lengths to which employers will go to crush their employees trying to gain a union voice. This campaign has become the prime example for why we need labor law reform in this country.”

 ?? CHARITY RACHELLE/THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? A woman speaks at a rally supporting Amazon workers at the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union building in Birmingham, Ala., on Friday.
CHARITY RACHELLE/THE NEW YORK TIMES A woman speaks at a rally supporting Amazon workers at the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union building in Birmingham, Ala., on Friday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States