The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

■ FDA to meet with outside advisers on coronaviru­s booster shots,

- By Laurie Mcginley and Dan Diamond

The Food and Drug Administra­tion has scheduled a key meeting on coronaviru­s boosters with its outside advisers for Sept. 17 — just a few days before the Biden administra­tion’s planned starting date for an extra-shot campaign.

The session, which will be public, could add much-needed clarity and transparen­cy to a decision-making process some people have criticized as confusing. But it could also fuel more controvers­y over an administra­tion position some experts regard as premature.

One of the panel members is Paul A. Offit, a vaccine expert at Children’s Hospital of Philadelph­ia who has questioned whether boosters are needed at this time because data indicates the vaccines remain effective against severe COVID-19, the disease caused by the coronaviru­s. Administra­tion officials have responded that protection is waning, and it is important to make a plan before it is too late.

Though the purpose of the meeting is to review booster data on the Pfizer-biontech vaccine, it is likely to deal more broadly with hotly debated questions: What is the United States trying to achieve with vaccines? What is our obligation to other countries? Who should get boosters and when?

The panel’s recommenda­tions are not binding. But a split between the FDA’S outside experts and agency officials could make it more difficult for the agency to approve boosters. On the other hand, if the committee concludes boosters are needed, it could strengthen the administra­tion’s position and the agency’s hand in approving a Pfizer-biontech third shot and authorizin­g boosters by Moderna and Johnson & Johnson. The twoshot Pfizer regimen received full FDA approval last week, while the Moderna and Johnson & Johnson vaccines continue to be administer­ed under an emergency use authorizat­ion.

Peter Marks, director of the FDA’S Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, said “a transparen­t, thorough and objective review of the data by the FDA is critical so that the medical community and the public continue to have confidence in the safety and effectiven­ess of COVID-19 vaccines.”

Outside experts praised the scheduling of the meeting, saying it shows the agency is trying to stick to the normal procedures on vaccines, even amid urgency caused by the hyper-transmissi­ble delta variant. The Biden administra­tion announced Aug. 18 that boosters would be available the week of Sept. 20 to most individual­s fully vaccinated eight months earlier, pending clearance from the FDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Critics said the announceme­nt placed pressure on the agencies, adding that typically the FDA and the CDC and their advisers would review data before decisions were announced.

“It’s a good sign that the FDA is trying to adhere to a regular process,” said Jason L. Schwartz, associate professor of health policy and the history of medicine at the Yale School of Public Health. But he added the meeting could be “awkward,” with the administra­tion receiving criticism for “a really messy sequence of events.”

That argument was amplified Tuesday when news broke that two top vaccine officials said they would retire this fall. Marion Gruber, who leads the Office of Vaccines Research and Review, is scheduled to depart the FDA at the end of October. Philip Krause, Gruber’s deputy, is expected to leave the agency in November. The two career officials have decades of experience in vaccines and have helped steer the agency’s efforts through a demanding period that began 18 months ago with the pandemic. Their planned departures were first reported by Biocentury, an industry publicatio­n.

People familiar with the decisions said Gruber has been talking about retiring for some time but that Krause’s decision was more of a surprise.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States