The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Michigan terrorism charge ‘fits language of the statute’

Michigan prosecutor­s on Wednesday charged a teen with terrorism in a deadly mass shooting at his high school, a novel approach made possible by a law enacted after the 9/11 attacks nearly 20 years ago.

- Associated Press

What the law says

The state’s 2002 anti-terrorism law defines a terroristi­c act as one intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or to affect the conduct of a government through intimidati­on or coercion. Gun-control advocates who track gunfire incidents on school grounds were not immediatel­y aware of similar terrorism charges having been filed in other states.

“It’s not a usual, a typical charge,” Oakland County Prosecutor Karen Mcdonald said of terrorism causing death, adding that the four students who were killed and seven others who were shot are not the only victims. “What about all the children who ran, screaming, hiding under desks? What about all the children at home right now, who can’t eat and can’t sleep and can’t imagine a world where they could ever step foot back in that school? Those are victims, too, and so are their families and so is the community. The charge of terrorism reflects that.”

The charges

Ethan Crumbley, 15, also was charged with first-degree murder, assault with intent to commit murder and gun crimes in Tuesday’s attack at Oxford High School. He faces life in prison on both the terrorism and murder counts. Crumbley pleaded not guilty.

Michigan, unlike federal law and some states with their own anti-terrorism laws, has a broader definition beyond pressuring or retaliatin­g against only the government with violence. In Florida, for instance — where the 2018 high school massacre in Parkland occurred — the shooter was not charged with terrorism. Nor was the shooter in a 2017 rampage at the Fort Lauderdale-hollywood Internatio­nal Airport, which was a federal case.

Oakland County Sheriff Mike Bouchard said he “100%” backs the terrorism charge against Crumbley.

“If you weren’t hit by a bullet, it doesn’t mean you weren’t terrorized that day and won’t have nightmares about (it) the rest of your life — whether you’re a parent, a teacher or a student in that class,” he said.

First terrorism charge

In 2012, the Michigan attorney general’s office for the first time issued a terrorism charge after authoritie­s apprehende­d a man who fired shots from his car at about two-dozen vehicles along the Interstate 96 corridor.

The law more typically has been used to charge people with making terroristi­c threats, such as calling in bomb threats, said Matthew Schneider, a former federal prosecutor who is uninvolved in the case and who previously was the state’s chief deputy attorney general.

In 2005, a Michigan teen accused of plotting a massacre at his Macomb County high school was convicted of threatenin­g an act of terrorism and other charges in a county-filed case that appeared to be one of the first in the country to apply anti-terrorism laws to threats of school violence.

“This is why we have this law. It’s for this type of case. This is not just a murder case,” Schneider said of this week’s slayings. “It’s going to terrorize a generation of these kids who were in the school. The impact is on thousands of people.”

Why enact the law?

He said lawmakers who enacted the law were thinking of terrorism in the traditiona­l sense in the months after 9/11.

“But since that time it’s been used for other things,” he said. “That doesn’t mean that it’s being used improperly because it fits the elements. It fits the language of the statute.”

Schneider likened the state law to the 1970 federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizati­ons Act, or RICO, which was written with the mob in mind but now helps prosecute “all kinds of things” including street gangs.

Michigan’s law also was utilized last year when Attorney General Dana Nessel charged several men with providing material support for terrorist acts in plots to kidnap Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and attack the state Capitol.

America’s employers slowed the pace of their hiring in November, adding 210,000 jobs, the lowest monthly gain in nearly a year.

What happened

But Friday’s report from the Labor Department also showed that the nation’s unemployme­nt rate tumbled from 4.6% to 4.2% evidence that many more people reported that they had a job. That is a historical­ly low jobless rate though still above the pre-pandemic level of 3.5%.

Overall, the November jobs figures point to a job market and an economic recovery that look resilient though under threat from a spike in inflation, shortages of workers and supplies and the potential impact of the omicron variant of the coronaviru­s.

What it means

For months, employers have been struggling with worker shortages because many people who lost jobs in the pandemic have not, for various reasons, returned to the workforce. But last month, more Americans came off the sidelines to look for jobs and were generally hired quickly.

Why it matters

That positive trend suggests that November was a healthier month for job growth than the modest 210,000 gain the government reported Friday in its survey of businesses. The unemployme­nt rate is calculated from a separate survey of households. This survey found that a much larger 1.1 million more people reported that they were employed last month. The results of the two surveys typically match up over the long run but sometimes diverge sharply in a given month, as they did in November.

The survey of households found that the number of unemployed Americans sank in November to 6.9 million, not far above the pre-pandemic number of 5.7 million. And average wages, which have been rising as employers try to attract or keep workers, increased a strong 4.8%

from a year ago.

What’s next

With inflation at a three-decade high and far above the Fed’s 2% annual target, reaching its employment mandate would heighten pressure on Chair Jerome Powell to raise interest rates sooner rather than later. Doing so would make loans more expensive for many individual­s and businesses.

About half of those who have dropped out of the workforce have retired. The other half includes parents, mostly mothers, who stayed home to care for children during closings of schools and day cares. For some of these women, child care remains unavailabl­e or unaffordab­le. Some other people have become self-employed. And others continue to delay their job hunts for fear of contractin­g COVID-19.

 ?? SCOTT OLSON/GETTY IMAGES/TNS ?? People visit a makeshift memorial outside of Oxford High School on Wednesday in Oxford, Michigan. Four students were killed and seven people were injured Tuesday when a gunman opened fire at the school.
SCOTT OLSON/GETTY IMAGES/TNS People visit a makeshift memorial outside of Oxford High School on Wednesday in Oxford, Michigan. Four students were killed and seven people were injured Tuesday when a gunman opened fire at the school.
 ?? DAVID ZALUBOWSKI/ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? For months, employers have been struggling with pandemic worker shortages, but last month, more Americans came off the sidelines to look for jobs and were generally hired quickly.
DAVID ZALUBOWSKI/ASSOCIATED PRESS For months, employers have been struggling with pandemic worker shortages, but last month, more Americans came off the sidelines to look for jobs and were generally hired quickly.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States